Suppr超能文献

环氧化酶-2选择性非甾体抗炎药的风险与获益

Risks versus benefits of cyclooxygenase-2-selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

作者信息

Chaiamnuay Sumapa, Allison Jeroan J, Curtis Jeffrey R

机构信息

Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Oct 1;63(19):1837-51. doi: 10.2146/ajhp050519.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A summary of the basic science underlying the current controversies regarding cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including data on their cardiovascular safety, their gastrointestinal (GI) benefits, cost-effectiveness, physician-prescribing trends, and recommendations for prescribing these agents is presented.

SUMMARY

A number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported that COX-2-selective NSAIDs increase cardiovascular events, although there appear to be gradations of risks among the COX-2-selective NSAIDs. In addition, traditional NSAIDs may increase the risk for cardiovascular events, complicating the interpretation of RCTs that use traditional NSAIDs as comparators. Selective inhibitors of COX-2-selective NSAIDs are effective antiinflammatory and analgesic drugs with improved upper-GI safety compared to traditional NSAIDs. Data on the cost-effectiveness of COX-2-selective NSAIDs indicate that they should be limited to patients at high risk for upper-GI adverse effects. However, they had been increasingly used in patients with lower GI risks until recent events reversed that trend. Circumstances under which COX-2-selective NSAIDs may be appropriate are in patients at high GI risk and in patients who did not respond to multiple traditional NSAIDs. The national spotlight in the United States on NSAID-related adverse events and recent lawsuits against health care providers prescribing COX-2-selective NSAIDs further highlights the need for provider-patient communication and risk disclosure. The relative cardiovascular risks of NSAIDs are similar in magnitude to other currently prescribed therapies.

CONCLUSION

Health care providers must consider the efficacy, GI and cardiovascular risks, concomitant medications, and costs when determining the appropriateness of COX-2-selective NSAID therapy.

摘要

目的

总结当前关于环氧化酶-2(COX-2)选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)争议背后的基础科学知识,包括其心血管安全性、胃肠道(GI)益处、成本效益、医生处方趋势的数据,以及开具这些药物的建议。

总结

多项随机对照试验(RCTs)报告称,COX-2选择性NSAIDs会增加心血管事件,尽管不同的COX-2选择性NSAIDs之间似乎存在风险等级差异。此外,传统NSAIDs可能会增加心血管事件风险,这使得将传统NSAIDs用作对照的RCTs的解读变得复杂。COX-2选择性NSAIDs的选择性抑制剂是有效的抗炎和镇痛药,与传统NSAIDs相比,其对上消化道的安全性有所提高。关于COX-2选择性NSAIDs成本效益的数据表明,它们应仅限于上消化道不良反应高风险患者。然而,直到最近的事件扭转了这一趋势之前,它们在胃肠道风险较低的患者中使用得越来越多。COX-2选择性NSAIDs可能适用的情况是胃肠道高风险患者以及对多种传统NSAIDs无反应的患者。美国对NSAIDs相关不良事件的全国关注以及最近针对开具COX-2选择性NSAIDs的医疗保健提供者的诉讼进一步凸显了医患沟通和风险披露的必要性。NSAIDs的相对心血管风险与其他目前开具的疗法在程度上相似。

结论

医疗保健提供者在确定COX-2选择性NSAIDs治疗的适用性时,必须考虑疗效、胃肠道和心血管风险、合并用药以及成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验