Suppr超能文献

一项针对4个州出狱青年男性的多阶段性风险降低干预措施的相对疗效。

Relative efficacy of a multisession sexual risk-reduction intervention for young men released from prisons in 4 states.

作者信息

Wolitski Richard J

机构信息

Prevention Research Branch, Division of HIV and AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2006 Oct;96(10):1854-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.056044.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effects of an enhanced multisession intervention with a single-session intervention on the sexual risk behavior of young men released from prison.

METHODS

Young men, aged 18 to 29 years, were recruited from US prisons in 4 states and systematically assigned to the prerelease single-session intervention or the pre- and postrelease enhanced intervention. Both interventions addressed HIV, hepatitis, and other sexually transmitted infections; the enhanced intervention also addressed community reentry needs (e.g., housing, employment). Assessment data were collected before intervention, and 1, 12, and 24 weeks after release.

RESULTS

A total of 522 men were included in intent-to-treat analyses. Follow-up rates ranged from 76% to 87%. Unprotected vaginal or anal sex during the 90 days before incarceration was reported by 86% of men in the enhanced intervention and 89% in the single-session intervention (OR=0.78; 95% CI=0.46, 1.32). At 24 weeks, 68% of men assigned to the enhanced intervention reported unprotected vaginal or anal sex compared with 78% of those assigned to the single-session intervention (OR=0.40; 95% CI=0.18, 0.88).

CONCLUSION

Project START demonstrated the efficacy of a sexual risk-reduction intervention that bridges incarceration and community reentry.

摘要

目的

我们比较了强化多阶段干预与单阶段干预对出狱年轻男性性风险行为的影响。

方法

从美国4个州的监狱招募年龄在18至29岁之间的年轻男性,并将他们系统地分配到释放前单阶段干预组或释放前及释放后强化干预组。两种干预均涉及艾滋病毒、肝炎及其他性传播感染;强化干预还涉及重新融入社区的需求(如住房、就业)。在干预前、释放后1周、12周和24周收集评估数据。

结果

共有522名男性纳入意向性分析。随访率在76%至87%之间。强化干预组中86%的男性报告在入狱前90天内有过无保护的阴道或肛交,单阶段干预组为89%(比值比=0.78;95%置信区间=0.46,1.32)。在24周时,强化干预组中68%的男性报告有过无保护的阴道或肛交,而单阶段干预组为78%(比值比=0.40;95%置信区间=0.18,0.88)。

结论

START项目证明了一种跨越监禁和重新融入社区阶段的降低性风险干预措施的有效性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验