• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现代对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的偏见:评估在爱尔兰背景下一种衡量现代恐同态度的方法的可行性。

Modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women: assessing the viability of a measure of modern homonegative attitudes within an Irish context.

作者信息

Morrison Todd G, Kenny Paula, Harrington Aoife

机构信息

Centre for Research on Life Stress, Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway.

出版信息

Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2005 Aug;131(3):219-50. doi: 10.3200/MONO.131.3.219-250.

DOI:10.3200/MONO.131.3.219-250
PMID:17009501
Abstract

The authors examined the psychometric properties of the gay and lesbian versions of the Modern Homonegativity Scale (MHS-G and MHS-L) in samples of heterosexual Irish university students (Ns=179 and 353). Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the MHS-G and MHS-L were unidimensional and factorially distinct from a well-established measure of old-fashioned homonegativity (Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale [ATLG]). Alpha coefficients for both versions of the MHS were good (range = .81 to .86), with 95% confidence intervals suggesting that unsatisfactory levels of scale score reliability (i.e., alpha values < .70) were relatively implausible. As hypothesized, participants' level of modern homonegativity correlated positively with their levels of old-fashioned and modem racism, patriotism, nationalism, religious fundamentalism, social dominance, and perceived political conservatism. The authors also observed a substantial inverse correlation between modern prejudice toward sexual minorities and support for their human rights. Finally, a series of multiple regression analyses indicated that, despite their interrelatedness, modern and old-fashioned homonegativity, particularly as they pertain to gay men, possess differential predictors. Limitations of the current series of studies and the need to conduct further research on attitudes toward sexual minorities within an Irish context are also discussed.

摘要

作者在爱尔兰异性恋大学生样本(样本量分别为179和353)中检验了现代同性恋消极量表的男同性恋版和女同性恋版(MHS - G和MHS - L)的心理测量特性。验证性因素分析表明,MHS - G和MHS - L是单维的,并且在因子上与一个成熟的传统同性恋消极性测量量表(对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的态度量表[ATLG])不同。MHS两个版本的阿尔法系数都很好(范围 = 0.81至0.86),95%置信区间表明量表得分可靠性水平不令人满意(即阿尔法值 < 0.70)的情况相对不太可能出现。正如所假设的,参与者的现代同性恋消极性水平与他们的传统和现代种族主义、爱国主义、民族主义、宗教原教旨主义、社会支配地位以及感知到的政治保守主义水平呈正相关。作者还观察到对性少数群体的现代偏见与对他们人权的支持之间存在显著的负相关。最后,一系列多元回归分析表明,尽管现代和传统同性恋消极性相互关联,但它们,特别是与男同性恋者相关的部分,具有不同的预测因素。本文还讨论了当前这一系列研究的局限性以及在爱尔兰背景下对性少数群体态度进行进一步研究的必要性。

相似文献

1
Modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women: assessing the viability of a measure of modern homonegative attitudes within an Irish context.现代对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的偏见:评估在爱尔兰背景下一种衡量现代恐同态度的方法的可行性。
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2005 Aug;131(3):219-50. doi: 10.3200/MONO.131.3.219-250.
2
Irish university students' support for the human rights of lesbian women and gay men.爱尔兰大学生对女同性恋者和男同性恋者人权的支持。
J Homosex. 2009;56(3):387-400. doi: 10.1080/00918360902728871.
3
A confirmatory factor analysis of the Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men (ATLG) measure.对“对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的态度”(ATLG)量表的验证性因素分析。
J Homosex. 2007;52(3-4):189-209. doi: 10.1300/J082v52n03_09.
4
Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women.一项针对男同性恋者和女同性恋者现代偏见的量表的编制与验证。
J Homosex. 2002;43(2):15-37. doi: 10.1300/j082v43n02_02.
5
Measuring homonegativity: psychometric analysis of Herek's attitudes toward lesbians and gay men scale (ATLG) in Colombia, South America.衡量对同性恋的消极态度:对赫雷克的南美哥伦比亚对女同性恋者和男同性恋者态度量表(ATLG)的心理测量分析。
J Homosex. 2015;62(7):924-35. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2014.1003014. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
6
Attitudes toward stereotypical versus counterstereotypical gay men and lesbians.对刻板印象化与反刻板印象化的男同性恋者和女同性恋者的态度。
J Sex Res. 2009 Jul-Aug;46(4):274-81. doi: 10.1080/00224490802666233.
7
The psychometric properties of the Homonegativity Scale.同性恋厌恶量表的心理测量特性。
J Homosex. 1999;37(4):111-26. doi: 10.1300/J082v37n04_07.
8
Psychometric properties of the Support for Lesbian and Gay Human Rights Scale.
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Apr;149(2):263-6. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.2.263-266.
9
Polymorphous prejudice: liberating the measurement of heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men.多形态偏见:解放对异性恋者对女同性恋者和男同性恋者态度的测量。
J Homosex. 2009;56(2):147-72. doi: 10.1080/00918360802623131.
10
The construction and validation of the homopositivity scale: an instrument measuring endorsement of positive stereotypes about gay men.同性恋积极态度量表的构建与验证:一种测量对男同性恋者积极刻板印象认同程度的工具。
J Homosex. 2007;52(3-4):63-89. doi: 10.1300/J082v52n03_04.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of sexual prejudice and gender on trait and state-level empathy.性偏见和性别对特质共情和状态共情的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 1;16:1527124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1527124. eCollection 2025.
2
Femmephobia Is a Uniquely Powerful Predictor of Anti-Gay Behavior.恐女症是预测反同行为的一个强有力的独特因素。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):127-140. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02704-5. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
3
Purely positive or discriminatorily positive? The development of two-factor attitudes toward lesbians and gay men scales.
纯粹积极还是区别对待的积极?对女同性恋者和男同性恋者态度的双因素量表的发展。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1211282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211282. eCollection 2023.
4
Psychometric Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Modern Homonegativity Scale among Portuguese College Students.葡萄牙大学生中现代同性恋厌恶量表葡萄牙语版本的心理测量学验证
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Aug 18;12(8):1168-1178. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12080081.
5
Homonegativity and its relationship to religiosity, nationalism and attachment style.同性恋憎恶及其与宗教信仰、民族主义和依恋风格的关系。
J Relig Health. 2011 Sep;50(3):575-91. doi: 10.1007/s10943-009-9286-2.