Harders Maureen, Malangoni Mark A, Weight Steven, Sidhu Tejbir
Department of Anesthesiology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Surgery. 2006 Oct;140(4):509-14; discussion 514-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.06.018. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
Operating rooms (ORs) are important resources for patient care and revenue, yet a significant portion of OR time is taken up by nonoperative activities. We hypothesized that redesigning the process that occurs between operations would lead to a decrease in nonoperative time (NOT = room turnover time plus anesthesia induction and emergence time).
Following a 3-month multidisciplinary planning process, a prospective study to reduce NOT was initiated in 2 of 17 ORs at a tertiary care academic medical center. Unlike previous reports, which have limited the number of participants, we constructed a process that was restricted only by case duration. The plan focused on minimizing nonoperative tasks in the OR, effecting parallel performance of activities, and reducing nonclinical disruptions. Eligible cases were those with an estimated operative time of 2 hours or less. A target NOT of 35 minutes was established. Cases of similar duration in the remaining ORs served as a concurrent control group.
Twenty-three surgeons, 13 anesthesiologists, and 11 nurses worked in the project ORs over a 3-month period. Residents participated in all cases. There was a significant reduction in NOT (42.2 +/- 12.9 vs 65 +/- 21.7 minutes), turnover time (26.4 +/- 11.2 vs 42.8 +/- 21.7 minutes), and anesthesia-related time (16.9 vs 21.9 minutes, all P < .001) in the project rooms compared with cases of similar duration in control ORs. Process-related delays were identified in 70% of cases when NOT exceeded the 35-minute target.
These results demonstrate that a coordinated multidisciplinary process redesign can significantly reduce NOT. This process is applicable to most ORs and has optimal benefit for cases of 2 hours or less in duration. The high percentage of residual process-related delays suggests that further improvements can be anticipated.
手术室是患者护理和医院收入的重要资源,但手术室时间的很大一部分被非手术活动占据。我们推测,重新设计手术之间的流程将减少非手术时间(非手术时间=房间周转时间加上麻醉诱导和苏醒时间)。
经过3个月的多学科规划过程,在一家三级医疗学术医学中心的17间手术室中的2间启动了一项减少非手术时间的前瞻性研究。与以往报告限制参与者数量不同,我们构建了一个仅受病例持续时间限制的流程。该计划侧重于将手术室中的非手术任务减至最少,实现活动的并行执行,并减少非临床干扰。符合条件的病例是预计手术时间为2小时或更短的病例。设定的非手术时间目标为35分钟。其余手术室中类似持续时间的病例作为同期对照组。
在3个月的时间里,23名外科医生、13名麻醉医生和11名护士在项目手术室工作。住院医师参与了所有病例。与对照组中类似持续时间的病例相比,项目手术室中的非手术时间(42.2±12.9分钟对65±21.7分钟)、周转时间(26.4±11.2分钟对42.8±21.7分钟)和麻醉相关时间(16.9分钟对21.9分钟,所有P<0.001)均显著减少。当非手术时间超过35分钟的目标时,70%的病例中发现了与流程相关的延迟。
这些结果表明,协调的多学科流程重新设计可显著减少非手术时间。该流程适用于大多数手术室,对持续时间为2小时或更短的病例具有最佳效益。与流程相关的延迟残留比例较高,表明有望进一步改进。