McVea Kristine L S P
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Health Psychol. 2006 Sep;25(5):558-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.558.
This report reviews the evidence that informs the role of health and mental health care providers in addressing youth smoking cessation.
Qualitative literature review.
Physicians do not consistently screen adolescents for tobacco use and fail to provide recommended cessation advice. Challenges to addressing smoking cessation include the need for procedures to ensure confidentiality and the existence of competing demands to provide other services. Few published studies have specifically addressed the effectiveness of clinical interventions. Interventions that require return visits or follow-up phone contacts are technically difficult to implement in this population. Successful interventions may require resources not available in nonresearch settings. Most studies have used brief clinical intervention as a control condition, making it impossible to evaluate its effectiveness.
There is little evidence that supports current clinical smoking cessation guidelines for adolescents. More research is needed to develop inexpensive, efficient clinical interventions that can provide youths access to smoking cessation help. Future challenges include reorganizing clinical systems to offer greater counseling by support staff or in electronic formats and to provide effective booster messages and follow-up care in a population that is difficult to track.
本报告回顾了有关健康和心理健康护理提供者在帮助青少年戒烟方面所起作用的相关证据。
定性文献综述。
医生并非始终对青少年进行烟草使用筛查,也未提供推荐的戒烟建议。解决戒烟问题面临的挑战包括需要确保保密的程序,以及存在提供其他服务的相互竞争的需求。很少有已发表的研究专门探讨临床干预措施的有效性。需要回访或后续电话联系的干预措施在这一人群中实施起来技术难度较大。成功的干预措施可能需要非研究环境中无法获得的资源。大多数研究将简短临床干预作为对照条件,因此无法评估其有效性。
几乎没有证据支持当前针对青少年的临床戒烟指南。需要开展更多研究,以开发出廉价、高效的临床干预措施,使青少年能够获得戒烟帮助。未来的挑战包括重组临床系统,以便由支持人员或以电子形式提供更多咨询服务,并在难以追踪的人群中提供有效的强化信息和后续护理。