Lichtenstein E
Oregon Research Institute, Eugene 97403-1983, USA.
Prev Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;26(5 Pt 2):S57-63. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0210.
Following a brief review of the etiology and prevalence of tobacco use and data on the effectiveness of prevention and cessation interventions, recommendations for a research agenda are outlined. It is suggested that research on youth tobacco initiation and cessation be given highest priority because of rising prevalence rates, fundamental social importance, and the widespread support for such efforts. Policy and community approaches to deterring youth tobacco use deserve particular attention. Adult intervention research should focus on health care settings and include factors that both help and hinder adoption and routine implementation of tobacco interventions by clinicians. Developing and evaluating practical ways of using nicotine replacement therapies or other pharmacological therapies in primary care are also of importance. Media interventions that segment the smoking population by age, ethnicity, and developmental milestones should be encouraged. Three approaches could profit from working conferences of investigators and other interested parties to review the data and suggest research directions: worksite interventions, interventions with ethnic populations, and matching or tailoring interventions to specified characteristics of smokers. The importance of devoting considerable resources to investigator-initiated contrasted with sponsor-directed research is discussed.
在简要回顾烟草使用的病因、流行情况以及预防和戒烟干预措施有效性的数据之后,概述了研究议程的建议。由于患病率上升、具有根本的社会重要性以及对此类努力的广泛支持,建议将青少年吸烟起始和戒烟研究列为最优先事项。阻止青少年使用烟草的政策和社区方法值得特别关注。成人干预研究应侧重于医疗保健环境,并纳入有助于和阻碍临床医生采用和常规实施烟草干预措施的因素。开发和评估在初级保健中使用尼古丁替代疗法或其他药物疗法的实用方法也很重要。应鼓励按年龄、种族和发育阶段对吸烟人群进行细分的媒体干预措施。研究者和其他相关方召开工作会议以审查数据并提出研究方向,三种方法可能从中受益:工作场所干预、针对特定族裔人群的干预以及根据吸烟者的特定特征匹配或定制干预措施。讨论了投入大量资源进行研究者发起的研究与赞助方主导的研究相比的重要性。