van der Maas Han L J, Dolan Conor V, Grasman Raoul P P P, Wicherts Jelte M, Huizenga Hilde M, Raijmakers Maartje E J
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):842-61. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842.
Scores on cognitive tasks used in intelligence tests correlate positively with each other, that is, they display a positive manifold of correlations. The positive manifold is often explained by positing a dominant latent variable, the g factor, associated with a single quantitative cognitive or biological process or capacity. In this article, a new explanation of the positive manifold based on a dynamical model is proposed, in which reciprocal causation or mutualism plays a central role. It is shown that the positive manifold emerges purely by positive beneficial interactions between cognitive processes during development. A single underlying g factor plays no role in the model. The model offers explanations of important findings in intelligence research, such as the hierarchical factor structure of intelligence, the low predictability of intelligence from early childhood performance, the integration/differentiation effect, the increase in heritability of g, and the Jensen effect, and is consistent with current explanations of the Flynn effect.
智力测试中使用的认知任务得分彼此之间呈正相关,也就是说,它们呈现出正相关的多面性。正多面性通常通过假定一个占主导地位的潜在变量——g因素来解释,该因素与单一的定量认知或生物过程或能力相关。在本文中,提出了一种基于动态模型的正多面性新解释,其中相互因果关系或共生关系起着核心作用。结果表明,正多面性纯粹是由发育过程中认知过程之间积极的有益相互作用产生的。单一的潜在g因素在该模型中不起作用。该模型为智力研究中的重要发现提供了解释,比如智力的层次因素结构、根据幼儿期表现对智力的低预测性、整合/分化效应、g的遗传力增加以及詹森效应,并且与当前对弗林效应的解释一致。