Irnich W
Department of Medical Engineering, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Federal Republic of Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Nov;13(11 Pt 1):1433-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb04019.x.
Around the turn of the last century, there was an intensive discussion among physiologists as to whether there is a law describing the phenomena of electrostimulation and which formula may best approximate it mathematically. J.L. Hoorweg found in 1892 that the voltage at which a capacitor must be charged to elicit an excitation, was a function of the capacitance in an inverse correlation. G. Weiss reported in 1901 that according to his investigations a linear relationship existed between the duration of a pulse and the corresponding quantity of electricity applied and called it "formule fondamentale." We are now able to give the "fundamental formula" a physical interpretation that yields, as result, the electric field produced by the electrode acting on the excitable membrane. The electric field in the extracellular space is transformed by the cell geometry ratio: cell length to membrane thickness yielding a high transmembrane field capable of reducing the inherent electric field to its threshold level. The consequences drawn from this hypothesis are remarkable and (should) have an influence on all applications of electrostimulation including the discussions on defibrillation. The application of the stimulation theory to defibrillation yields as results: (1) The basic engineering principle of defibrillation is to produce an electric field within the ventricles of 400 V/m or more. An orthogonal pulse application may reduce the energy requirements, as more fibers are longitudinally reached by the electric field; (2) The shape of the defibrillation pulse and its polarity plays no role. Consequently it follows that biphasic pulses must be less efficient than monophasic pulses, if they are close to the chronaxie; and (3) The most serious disadvantage in today's defibrillation practice is its dose characterization in "energy"; but this physical quantity cannot be justified in the light of the fundamental law of electrostimulation.
在上个世纪之交,生理学家们就是否存在描述电刺激现象的定律以及哪个公式在数学上最能近似该定律展开了激烈讨论。1892年,J.L. 胡尔韦格发现,电容器必须充电到的引发兴奋的电压是电容的反函数。1901年,G. 魏斯报告称,根据他的研究,脉冲持续时间与施加的相应电量之间存在线性关系,并将其称为“基本公式”。现在我们能够对“基本公式”给出一种物理解释,结果是得出由作用于可兴奋膜的电极产生的电场。细胞外空间中的电场通过细胞几何比(细胞长度与膜厚度之比)进行转换,产生一个能够将固有电场降低到其阈值水平的高跨膜电场。从这个假设得出的结论意义重大,并且(应该)会对电刺激的所有应用产生影响,包括关于除颤的讨论。将刺激理论应用于除颤得出以下结果:(1)除颤的基本工程原理是在心室中产生400 V/m或更高的电场。正交脉冲应用可能会降低能量需求,因为电场能纵向触及更多纤维;(2)除颤脉冲的形状及其极性不起作用。因此,如果双相脉冲接近时值,那么它们的效率必然低于单相脉冲;(3)当今除颤实践中最严重的缺点是其以“能量”进行剂量表征;但根据电刺激基本定律,这个物理量是不合理的。