• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环青霉素(ACPC)对临床分离菌株抗菌活性的体外研究(作者译)

[In vitro examination on antibacterial activity of ciclacillin (ACPC) against clinically isolated strains (author's transl)].

作者信息

Deguchi K

出版信息

Jpn J Antibiot. 1977 May;30(5):315-20.

PMID:17021
Abstract

(1) The antibacterial acivity of ciclacillin (ACPC) with inoculum size of 10(6) cells/ml was four times less potent than that of ampicillin (ABPC) and 4 approximately 8 times less potent than that of AMPC, but was 4 approximately 8 times more potent than that of CEX against Streptococcus pyogenes. For Streptococcus pneumoniae, ACPC was 2 approximately 4 times less active than ABPC and AMPC, but 16 approximately 32 times more active than CEX. Staphylococcus aureus was 4 approximately 8 times less susceptible to ACPC than to ABPC and AMPC, but 1 approximately 2 times more susceptible than to CEX. Against E. coli, ACPC was as active as CEX, 2 approximately 4 times less active than ABPC, and 4 approximately 8 times less active than AMPC. (2) It was suposed that ACPC was more resistant to penicillinase and more antibacterial with inoculum size of 10(6) cells/ml cells/ml than with 10(6) cells/ml. ACPC was 4 approximately 8 times less active than ABPC, and AMPC against Staphylococcus aureus with 10(8) cells/ml, while with 10(6) cells/ml, it was 2 times less active than ABPC and AMPC. (3) ACPC-resistant strains (greater than or equal to 3.13 microng/ml) of Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae were not found. (4) A difference was noted in MIC of three semi-synthetic penicillins, ACPC, ABPC and AMPC, against Staphylococcus aureus, and E. coli between the sources from which their strains were isolated. (5) There were many strains resistant to erythromycin (EM) and josamycin (JM) (greater than 60%, respectively to both antibiotics) in Stretpococcus pyogenes and pus-isolated Staphylococcus aureus. No strains of Streptococcus pyogenes, were found resistant to EM and JM.

摘要

(1) 环青霉素(ACPC)对每毫升含10⁶个细胞接种量的抗菌活性比氨苄西林(ABPC)低四倍,比氨氯青霉素(AMPC)低约4至8倍,但对化脓性链球菌的抗菌活性比头孢氨苄(CEX)高约4至8倍。对于肺炎链球菌,ACPC的活性比ABPC和AMPC低约2至4倍,但比CEX高16至32倍。金黄色葡萄球菌对ACPC的敏感性比ABPC和AMPC低约4至8倍,但比CEX高约1至2倍。对大肠杆菌而言,ACPC的活性与CEX相当,比ABPC低约2至4倍,比AMPC低约4至8倍。(2) 据推测,ACPC对青霉素酶的抗性更强,且每毫升含10⁶个细胞接种量时的抗菌活性比每毫升含10⁸个细胞时更高。ACPC对每毫升含10⁸个细胞的金黄色葡萄球菌的活性比ABPC和AMPC低约4至8倍,而每毫升含10⁶个细胞时,其活性比ABPC和AMPC低2倍。(3) 未发现化脓性链球菌和肺炎链球菌的ACPC耐药菌株(大于或等于3.13微克/毫升)。(4) 注意到三种半合成青霉素ACPC、ABPC和AMPC对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)因菌株分离来源不同而存在差异。(5) 在化脓性链球菌和脓性分泌物分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌中,有许多菌株对红霉素(EM)和交沙霉素(JM)耐药(分别对两种抗生素的耐药率均大于60%)。未发现化脓性链球菌对EM和JM耐药的菌株。

相似文献

1
[In vitro examination on antibacterial activity of ciclacillin (ACPC) against clinically isolated strains (author's transl)].环青霉素(ACPC)对临床分离菌株抗菌活性的体外研究(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1977 May;30(5):315-20.
2
[In vitro activity of josamycin in a comparison of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae].[交沙霉素对金黄色葡萄球菌、化脓性链球菌和肺炎链球菌的体外活性比较]
Minerva Med. 1983 Mar 24;74(12):619-24.
3
[Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial potencies of oral antibiotics against sputum isolates].[口服抗生素对痰液分离株的体外抗菌效力评估]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Aug;36(8):2103-8.
4
[Studies on susceptibility of isolated organisms from pediatric infections against various antimicrobial agents].[关于从儿科感染中分离出的微生物对各种抗菌剂敏感性的研究]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1988 Jul;41(7):841-53.
5
[Comparison of antimicrobial and bactericidal activities and postantibiotic effects of macrolides antibiotics against clinical isolates, and examination of shape alteration by scanning electron microscope].[大环内酯类抗生素对临床分离株的抗菌和杀菌活性及抗生素后效应比较,以及通过扫描电子显微镜检查形态改变]
Jpn J Antibiot. 2007 Feb;60(1):31-46.
6
[Comparison of in vitro activity of first, second and third generation cephem antibiotics against various pathogens isolated from clinical materials in 1983].[1983年第一代、第二代和第三代头孢菌素类抗生素对从临床材料中分离出的各种病原体的体外活性比较]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1984 Jun;37(6):1040-57.
7
[Sensitivity of bacteria inducing urinary infections to 3 drugs (amoxicillin, ampicillin and cephalexin) and clinical efficacy of amoxicillin (author's transl)].引起泌尿系统感染的细菌对三种药物(阿莫西林、氨苄西林和头孢氨苄)的敏感性及阿莫西林的临床疗效(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1975 Dec;28(6):795-801.
8
[Antimicrobial activities of roxithromycin against recently obtained clinical isolates].罗红霉素对近期获得的临床分离株的抗菌活性
Jpn J Antibiot. 1997 Jul;50(7):640-9.
9
Sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from skin infections in 1992 to antimicrobial agents.1992年从皮肤感染中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌和化脓性链球菌对抗菌药物的敏感性。
J Dermatol. 1994 Apr;21(4):233-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1994.tb01728.x.
10
[Annual changes in susceptibility of clinical isolates to midecamycin acetate].[临床分离株对醋酸麦迪霉素敏感性的年度变化]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1990 Aug;43(8):1341-52.