Laperche Syria, Thibault Vincent, Bouchardeau Françoise, Alain Sophie, Castelain Sandrine, Gassin Michelle, Gueudin Marie, Halfon Philippe, Larrat Sylvie, Lunel Françoise, Martinot-Peignoux Michèle, Mercier Bernard, Pawlotsky Jean-Michel, Pozzetto Bruno, Roque-Afonso Anne-Marie, Roudot-Thoraval Françoise, Sauné Karine, Lefrère Jean-Jacques
Centre National de Référence pour les Hépatites B et C en Transfusion, Département des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine, Paris, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Oct;44(10):3600-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00732-06.
A national evaluation study was performed in 14 specialized laboratories with the objective of assessing their capacities to provide (i) hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral loads (VL), (ii) HBV genotypes, and(iii) identification of precore/core mutants. The panel consisted of 12 HBV DNA-positive samples with VLs from 2.8 to 9.1 log(10) copies/ml, different HBV genotypes (A to F), and 3 mutant and 9 wild-type samples at nucleotide 1896. The coefficients of variation of the mean VLs ranged from 2.4% to 10.4% with the Cobas HBV Monitor assay, from 1.8% to 5.5% with the Cobas TaqMan 48, from 1.5 to 26.2% with RealArt HBV PCR, and from 0 to 7% with branched DNA (bDNA). The Cobas Monitor assay underestimated the VLs of genotype F samples, with differences ranging from 1.4 to 2.4 log(10) copies/ml. The accuracies of genotype determinations ranged from 33% to 100%, and those of precore mutant determinations ranged from 25 to 100%. This study showed some drawbacks of two widely used assays: (i) Cobas Monitor has a narrow dynamic range and underestimates genotype F sample VLs and (ii) bDNA shows poor sensitivity and may fail to identify patients with low VLs. With higher performance in terms of analytical sensitivity combined with a larger dynamic range and an ability to quantify the main genotypes equally, real-time PCR methods appear more appropriate for accurate monitoring of HBV DNA quantification. Furthermore, the clinical implications of HBV genotyping and the determination of precore/core mutants need to be clearly stated to justify the standardization of these methods.
在14个专业实验室开展了一项全国性评估研究,目的是评估它们提供以下检测的能力:(i)乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)病毒载量(VL);(ii)HBV基因型;(iii)前核心/核心突变体鉴定。该样本组包括12份HBV DNA阳性样本,病毒载量为2.8至9.1 log(10)拷贝/毫升,涵盖不同的HBV基因型(A至F),以及在核苷酸1896处的3份突变体样本和9份野生型样本。使用Cobas HBV监测检测法时,平均病毒载量的变异系数在2.4%至10.4%之间;使用Cobas TaqMan 48检测法时,变异系数在1.8%至5.5%之间;使用RealArt HBV PCR检测法时,变异系数在1.5%至26.2%之间;使用分支DNA(bDNA)检测法时,变异系数在0%至7%之间。Cobas监测检测法低估了F基因型样本的病毒载量,差异范围为1.4至2.4 log(10)拷贝/毫升。基因型测定的准确率在33%至100%之间,前核心突变体测定的准确率在25%至100%之间。这项研究显示了两种广泛使用的检测方法存在的一些缺陷:(i)Cobas监测检测法动态范围窄,低估了F基因型样本的病毒载量;(ii)bDNA检测法灵敏度差,可能无法识别病毒载量低的患者。实时PCR方法在分析灵敏度方面表现更高,同时具有更大的动态范围以及能够平等地对主要基因型进行定量,似乎更适合准确监测HBV DNA定量。此外,需要明确说明HBV基因分型和前核心/核心突变体测定的临床意义,以便为这些方法的标准化提供依据。