Beuselinck Kurt, van Ranst Marc, van Eldere J
Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Nov;43(11):5541-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5541-5546.2005.
The performance of the m1000 system (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois) as a front-end extraction system for high-throughput "in-house" quantitative real-time PCR assays was analyzed and compared to that of manual extraction of plasma and serum samples (hepatitis C virus [HCV] and hepatitis B virus [HBV]) and EDTA-blood samples (cytomegalovirus [CMV] and Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]). Linearity of extraction was tested on dilution series of HCV and HBV reference materials. The correlation coefficient for standard curves based on repeated extraction runs was 0.97 +/- 0.06 for HCV and 0.97 +/- 0.03 for HBV, indicating a linear extraction from 100 to 1.0 x 10(5) HCV IU/ml and from 100 to 1.0 x 10(6) HBV IU/ml. Intra- and interrun variability was below 0.23 log(10) IU/ml for 2.98 to 5.28 log(10) HCV IU/ml and 2.70 to 5.20 log(10) HBV IU/ml. Correlation between automated and manual extraction was very good. For HCV, the correlation coefficient was 0.91 and the mean difference in viral load was 0.13 log(10) HCV IU/ml. For HBV, the correlation coefficient was 0.98 and the mean difference in viral load 0.61 log(10) HBV IU/ml. For CMV and EBV, the correlation coefficient was 0.98 and the mean difference in viral load 0.33 log(10) copies/ml. Accuracy was confirmed with a reference panel (QCMD, Glasgow, Scotland) for all four assays. No cross-contamination was observed when extracting strongly positive polyomavirus samples (8.10 log(10) copies/ml) interspersed with polyomavirus-negative samples. Automated extraction via the m1000 system offers a high reliability of extraction and resulted in a strong reduction of the required extraction hands-on time for high-throughput PCR compared to manual extraction protocols.
分析了m1000系统(雅培实验室,伊利诺伊州)作为高通量“内部”定量实时PCR检测的前端提取系统的性能,并将其与血浆和血清样本(丙型肝炎病毒[HCV]和乙型肝炎病毒[HBV])以及乙二胺四乙酸血样(巨细胞病毒[CMV]和爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒[EBV])的手动提取性能进行了比较。在HCV和HBV参考物质的稀释系列上测试了提取的线性。基于重复提取运行的标准曲线的相关系数,HCV为0.97±0.06,HBV为0.97±0.03,表明在100至1.0×10⁵HCV IU/ml和100至1.0×10⁶HBV IU/ml范围内提取呈线性。对于2.98至5.28 log₁₀ HCV IU/ml和2.70至5.20 log₁₀ HBV IU/ml,批内和批间变异低于0.23 log₁₀ IU/ml。自动提取和手动提取之间的相关性非常好。对于HCV,相关系数为0.91,病毒载量的平均差异为0.13 log₁₀ HCV IU/ml。对于HBV,相关系数为0.98,病毒载量的平均差异为0.61 log₁₀ HBV IU/ml。对于CMV和EBV,相关系数为0.98,病毒载量的平均差异为0.33 log₁₀拷贝/ml。通过一个参考面板(QCMD,格拉斯哥,苏格兰)确认了所有四种检测的准确性。在穿插提取多瘤病毒阴性样本时,提取强阳性多瘤病毒样本(8.10 log₁₀拷贝/ml)时未观察到交叉污染。与手动提取方案相比,通过m1000系统进行自动提取具有很高的提取可靠性,并大大减少了高通量PCR所需的提取实际操作时间。