Suppr超能文献

分娩时的硬膜外麻醉:它会影响分娩方式吗?

Epidural anaesthesia for labour: does it influence the mode of delivery?

作者信息

Ros Andrea, Felberbaum Ricardo, Jahnke Iris, Diedrich Klaus, Schmucker Peter, Hüppe Michael

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007 Apr;275(4):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0248-6. Epub 2006 Sep 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidural anaesthesia (EDA) is an effective method to lower labour pain. EDA might have an impact on instrumental delivery rates and on caesarean section rates. The present study compares the mode of delivery in women who were either receiving EDA or not. The indication for EDA was pain relief only in order to switch off a selection bias.

METHODS

During a 1-year duration, we included a total of 1,452 cases. Exclusion criteria were factors that could influence the mode of delivery, independent from EDA, as well as obstetrical indications for administering EDA. 530 women remained in the analysis. The primary outcome variable was the mode of delivery.

RESULTS

We detected in both nullipara and multipara a statistically significant accumulatin in patients with EDA and caesarean section combined. Most importantly, the majority of the women without EDA (57% of nullipara and 60% of multipara) delivered within the median timeframe from admission until administration of EDA.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems to be obvious to conclude that EDA as performed in our study results in a higher rate of caesarean sections. It is important though to take into consideration that between the period from admission to the delivery ward and administration of EDA most of the parturients without EDA had already delivered. Our results make evident, that the administration of EDA exclusively used for reducing labour pain is a result of a complex collaboration of temporal conditions of labour as well as psychological conditions and also of the mother's wish.

摘要

背景

硬膜外麻醉(EDA)是减轻分娩疼痛的有效方法。EDA可能会对器械助产率和剖宫产率产生影响。本研究比较了接受EDA和未接受EDA的女性的分娩方式。EDA的指征仅为缓解疼痛,以消除选择偏倚。

方法

在1年的时间里,我们共纳入了1452例病例。排除标准是可能影响分娩方式的因素(独立于EDA)以及实施EDA的产科指征。530名女性纳入分析。主要结局变量是分娩方式。

结果

我们发现,初产妇和经产妇中,EDA联合剖宫产的患者在统计学上有显著累积。最重要的是,大多数未接受EDA的女性(初产妇的57%和经产妇的60%)在入院至实施EDA的中位时间内分娩。

结论

似乎可以明显得出结论,我们研究中实施的EDA导致了更高的剖宫产率。然而,重要的是要考虑到,在从入院到产房以及实施EDA的这段时间里,大多数未接受EDA的产妇已经分娩。我们的结果表明,仅用于减轻分娩疼痛的EDA的实施是分娩时间条件、心理条件以及母亲意愿等复杂因素共同作用的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验