• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health locus of control and self-efficacy predict back pain rehabilitation outcomes.健康控制点和自我效能感可预测背痛康复结果。
Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:158-65.
2
Effectiveness of a cognitive behavioural therapy-based rehabilitation programme (Progressive Goal Attainment Program) for patients who are work-disabled due to back pain: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.基于认知行为疗法的康复计划(渐进式目标达成计划)对因背痛而丧失工作能力患者的有效性:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Sep 11;14:290. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-290.
3
Recovering the capability to work among patients with chronic low Back pain after a four-week, multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation program: 18-month follow-up study.在为期四周的多学科生物心理社会康复计划后,慢性下腰痛患者恢复工作能力:18 个月随访研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 10;20(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2831-6.
4
Health-care utilization of patients with chronic back pain before and after rehabilitation.慢性背痛患者康复前后的医疗保健利用情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2757-3.
5
Multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛的多学科生物-心理-社会康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD000963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000963.
6
WITHDRAWN: Multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low-back pain.撤回:慢性下腰痛的多学科生物心理社会康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(2):CD000963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub2.
7
Treatment of low back pain: First extended follow up of an original trial (NCT00600197) comparing a multidisciplinary group-based rehabilitation program with oral drug treatment alone up to 24 months.腰痛治疗:原始试验的首次扩展随访(NCT00600197),比较了多学科小组为基础的康复计划与单独的口服药物治疗,随访时间长达 24 个月。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;20(12):1902-1909. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12468. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
8
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation versus usual care for chronic low back pain in the community: effects on quality of life.社区慢性下腰痛的多学科康复与常规护理:对生活质量的影响
Spine J. 2003 Jul-Aug;3(4):270-6. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00028-7.
9
Predictors of multidisciplinary treatment outcome in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者多学科治疗结果的预测因素
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(14):1242-50. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.961657. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
10
Effectiveness of subgroup-specific pain rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic back pain.亚组特异性疼痛康复的效果:慢性腰痛患者的随机对照试验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):358-370. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04716-5. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: Insights based on physiotherapists messages.下背痛患者对安慰性信息的认知:基于物理治疗师信息的见解
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0323580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323580. eCollection 2025.
2
Locus of control and breathlessness: a cross-sectional analysis of 28 730 people.控制点与呼吸急促:对28730人的横断面分析
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Aug 4;11(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00908-2024. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Patient empowerment: a critical evaluation and prescription for a foundational definition.患者赋权:对基础定义的批判性评估与建议
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 17;15:1473345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1473345. eCollection 2024.
4
Prehabilitation: The underutilised weapon for chronic pain management.术前康复:慢性疼痛管理中未得到充分利用的手段。
Br J Pain. 2024 Aug;18(4):354-364. doi: 10.1177/20494637241250239. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
5
Are Clinical Prediction Rules Used in Spinal Cord Injury Care? A Survey of Practice.临床预测规则是否用于脊髓损伤护理?实践调查。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024 Winter;30(1):45-58. doi: 10.46292/sci23-00069. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
6
Associations among loneliness, internal locus of control and subjective accelerated ageing in older adults who received the booster vaccination.接受加强疫苗接种的老年人中孤独感、内控点与主观加速衰老之间的关联。
BJPsych Open. 2024 Feb 26;10(2):e54. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.14.
7
Drivers, barriers, and response to care of Australian pregnant women seeking chiropractic care for low back and pelvic girdle pain: a qualitative case study.澳大利亚孕妇因腰背痛和骨盆带疼痛寻求脊椎按摩治疗的驱动因素、障碍及对治疗的反应:一项定性案例研究
Chiropr Man Therap. 2023 Oct 3;31(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12998-023-00516-x.
8
Role of personal aptitudes as determinants of incident morbidity, lifestyles, quality of life, use of health services, and mortality (DESVELA cohort): quantitative study protocol for a prospective cohort study in a hybrid analysis.个人特质作为发病风险、生活方式、生活质量、卫生服务利用和死亡率决定因素的作用(DESVELA 队列):前瞻性队列研究的定量研究方案,采用混合分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 22;11:1067249. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1067249. eCollection 2023.
9
Meaning in Life among Older Adults: An Integrative Model.老年人生活意义:综合模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;19(24):16762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416762.
10
Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Employees with Mental Disorders or Musculoskeletal Diseases after Sickness-Related Absence: Validation of the German Version of the Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy Scale.与疾病相关缺勤后患有精神障碍或肌肉骨骼疾病的员工的自我效能感:《返岗自我效能感量表》德语版的验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;19(16):10093. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610093.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional self-efficacy beliefs influence functional capacity evaluation.功能自我效能信念会影响功能能力评估。
J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Mar;17(1):73-82. doi: 10.1007/s10926-007-9068-1.
2
Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain.5种Ergo-Kit功能能力评估提举测试在腰痛患者中的可靠性和一致性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Oct;87(10):1365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.028.
3
Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences.腰椎间盘疾病与腰痛:社会经济因素及后果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88 Suppl 2:21-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01273.
4
The validity of the multidimensional health locus of control scales.多维健康控制点量表的效度。
J Health Psychol. 2005 Sep;10(5):623-31. doi: 10.1177/1359105305055304.
5
Self-efficacy for managing pain is associated with disability, depression, and pain coping among retirement community residents with chronic pain.在患有慢性疼痛的退休社区居民中,疼痛管理的自我效能与残疾、抑郁及疼痛应对相关。
J Pain. 2005 Jul;6(7):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.02.011.
6
Disability, pain, psychological factors and physical performance in healthy controls, patients with sub-acute and chronic low back pain: a case-control study.健康对照者、亚急性和慢性下腰痛患者的残疾、疼痛、心理因素和身体机能:一项病例对照研究
J Rehabil Med. 2005 Mar;37(2):95-9. doi: 10.1080/16501970410017738.
7
Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in healthy adults.健康成年人中Isernhagen工作系统功能能力评估的重测信度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2004 Dec;14(4):295-305. doi: 10.1023/b:joor.0000047431.40598.47.
8
The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work.慢性下腰痛患者功能能力评估的预后价值:第1部分:及时重返工作岗位。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15;29(8):914-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00019.
9
Do health causal attributions and coping strategies act as moderators of quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients?健康因果归因和应对策略是否作为腹膜透析患者生活质量的调节因素?
J Psychosom Res. 2004 Mar;56(3):317-22. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00080-1.
10
Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work.举重能力、握力与重返工作岗位之间的关系。
Phys Ther. 2002 Mar;82(3):249-56.

健康控制点和自我效能感可预测背痛康复结果。

Health locus of control and self-efficacy predict back pain rehabilitation outcomes.

作者信息

Keedy Nicole H, Keffala Valerie J, Altmaier Elizabeth M, Chen Joseph J

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations University of Iowa.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation University of Iowa.

出版信息

Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:158-65.

PMID:25328476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4127740/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic back pain treatments have generally been costly and/or ineffective despite advances in medical technology. Patient selection and factors intrinsic to patients, including beliefs and behaviors, have been increasingly looked upon as possible predictive factors for success following multidisciplinary intervention for chronic back pain. The current study investigated the value of using patients' perceived control over health changes (health locus of control) and their perceived ability to engage in pain management behaviors (pain-related self-efficacy) to predict physical and mental health outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 61 patients who completed a two-week multidisciplinary chronic back pain rehabilitation program at our institution between 2007 and 2009. Patient demographics were identified and categorized. Pre- and post-intervention functional surveys, including the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Form C, Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Version 2, Beck Depression Inventory-II, and Oswestry Disability Index Version 2, were used to evaluate benefit from back pain intervention and to examine patient factors that may predict physical and mental health outcomes.

RESULTS

Participants included 28 males and 33 females, ages 28 to 72, completing chronic back pain rehabilitation. Locus of control, self-efficacy, and physical and mental health demonstrated treatment-related changes, with notable improvements in physical and mental health. Regression analyses examined the value of pre-treatment health locus of control and pain-related self-efficacy as predictors of physical and mental health one month following treatment. Higher internal and lower doctor health locus of control, and higher self-efficacy at baseline predicted higher lift scores one month after treatment (p <. 05; p <. 01; p <. 01, respectively). Higher baseline self-efficacy also predicted better physical functioning (p <. 01) and lower disability (p <. 01) at one month.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to supporting the multiple benefits of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, this study suggests that pain-related self-efficacy and health locus of control may be valuable predictors of treatment benefit for chronic back pain patients. These results provide direction in screening for factors that may maximize the potential to benefit from multidisciplinary intervention for chronic back pain.

摘要

引言

尽管医疗技术有所进步,但慢性背痛的治疗通常成本高昂且/或效果不佳。患者的选择以及患者自身的因素,包括信念和行为,越来越被视为慢性背痛多学科干预后成功的可能预测因素。本研究调查了利用患者对健康变化的感知控制(健康控制点)及其参与疼痛管理行为的感知能力(疼痛相关自我效能)来预测身心健康结果的价值。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2007年至2009年间在我们机构完成为期两周多学科慢性背痛康复计划的61名患者。确定并分类了患者的人口统计学特征。干预前后的功能调查,包括多维健康控制点C表、慢性疼痛自我效能量表、医学结果研究简短形式-36第2版、贝克抑郁量表-II和奥斯维斯特里残疾指数第2版,用于评估背痛干预的益处,并检查可能预测身心健康结果的患者因素。

结果

参与者包括28名男性和33名女性,年龄在28至72岁之间,完成了慢性背痛康复。控制点、自我效能以及身心健康表现出与治疗相关的变化,身心健康有显著改善。回归分析检验了治疗前健康控制点和疼痛相关自我效能作为治疗后一个月身心健康预测指标的价值。更高的内控和更低的医生健康控制点,以及基线时更高的自我效能预测治疗后一个月更高的提升分数(分别为p <.05;p <.01;p <.01)。更高的基线自我效能还预测一个月时更好的身体功能(p <.01)和更低的残疾程度(p <.01)。

结论

除了支持多学科康复的多种益处外,本研究表明疼痛相关自我效能和健康控制点可能是慢性背痛患者治疗益处的有价值预测指标。这些结果为筛选可能使慢性背痛多学科干预受益潜力最大化的因素提供了方向。