• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在教师研究中让学生符合道德规范地参与进来。

Ethically involving students in faculty research.

作者信息

Ferguson Linda M, Myrick Flo, Yonge Olive

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada S7N 5E5.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Dec;26(8):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.021. Epub 2006 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.021
PMID:17028074
Abstract

Students in nursing education programs have a right to privacy as they engage in their learning. At the same time, their faculty may be engaged in nursing education research in order to facilitate student learning. These two goals may conflict when faculty engage students as participants in nursing education research while at the same time facilitating their learning. Faculty as researchers with their students may encounter a conflict of interest in collecting data for their research while providing learning experiences for the same students. As a basic principle, students must be engaged as participants in an ethical manner that respects their rights for privacy. In this article, we explore the issues of faculty as researchers of their students and suggest strategies for addressing these issues.

摘要

护理教育项目中的学生在学习过程中有隐私权。与此同时,他们的教师可能会参与护理教育研究,以促进学生的学习。当教师让学生参与护理教育研究并同时促进他们的学习时,这两个目标可能会产生冲突。作为研究者的教师在为研究收集数据的同时为同一批学生提供学习体验时,可能会遇到利益冲突。作为一项基本原则,必须以尊重学生隐私权的道德方式让他们参与其中。在本文中,我们探讨了教师作为学生研究者的相关问题,并提出了解决这些问题的策略。

相似文献

1
Ethically involving students in faculty research.在教师研究中让学生符合道德规范地参与进来。
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Dec;26(8):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.021. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
2
Assuring ethical treatment of students as research participants.确保以符合伦理道德的方式对待作为研究参与者的学生。
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Oct;48(10):537-41. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090610-08. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
3
Ethically involving students in faculty research.让学生参与教师研究中的伦理问题。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2006 Dec;6(6):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2006.07.016. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
4
The adolescent research participant: strategies for productive and ethical interviewing.青少年研究参与者:进行富有成效和符合伦理的访谈的策略。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Dec;24(6):448-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2008.07.009. Epub 2009 May 14.
5
Ethical conduct in intimate partner violence research: challenges and strategies.亲密伴侣暴力研究中的伦理行为:挑战与策略。
Nurs Outlook. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.005.
6
Ethical considerations in phenomenological research.现象学研究中的伦理考量
Nurse Res. 2007;14(3):36-45. doi: 10.7748/nr2007.04.14.3.36.c6031.
7
Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia.访谈痴呆症患者时的伦理和方法学问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2007 Sep;14(5):608-19. doi: 10.1177/0969733007080206.
8
Researching student absence: methodological challenges and ethical issues.研究学生缺勤:方法学挑战和伦理问题。
Nurse Educ Today. 2010 May;30(4):291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
9
Ethical problems observed by student nurses.实习护士观察到的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2009 Sep;16(5):589-98. doi: 10.1177/0969733009106651.
10
The interview in qualitative research.定性研究中的访谈
Urol Nurs. 2005 Apr;25(2):124-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Psychological Well-Being on Learning Strategies: Analyzing Perceived Stress, Self-Esteem, and Study Approaches in Nursing and Obstetrics Students.心理健康对学习策略的影响:分析护理专业和产科专业学生的感知压力、自尊及学习方法
Nurs Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(3):109. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15030109.
2
Development of clinical competence - a longitudinal survey of nurse practitioner students.临床能力的发展——对执业护士学生的纵向调查。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jul 16;20(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00627-x.
3
Professionalism in practice: Exploring the ethical perplexity of involving students in Medical Education Research.
实践中的专业精神:探讨医学教育研究中让学生参与的伦理困境。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020 Oct;8(4):200-203. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.74921.0.