Shi Xuetao, Dong Xiuzhen, Shuai Wanjun, You Fusheng, Fu Feng, Liu Ruigang
Medical Electronic Engineering Department, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710033, People's Republic of China.
Physiol Meas. 2006 Nov;27(11):1071-80. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/27/11/002. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
Brain electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a difficult task as brain tissues are enclosed by the skull of high resistance and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of low resistance, which makes internal resistivity information more difficult to extract. In order to seek a single source drive pattern that is more suitable for brain EIT, we built a more realistic experimental setting that simulates a head with the resistivity of the scalp, skull, CSF and brain, and compared the performance of adjacent, cross, polar and pseudo-polar drive patterns in terms of the boundary voltage dynamic range, independent measurement number, total boundary voltage changes and anti-noise performance based on it. The results demonstrate that the pseudo-polar drive pattern is optimal in all the aspects except for the dynamic range. The polar and cross drive patterns come next, and the adjacent drive pattern is the worst. Therefore, the pseudo-polar drive pattern should be chosen for brain EIT.
脑电阻抗断层成像(EIT)是一项艰巨的任务,因为脑组织被高电阻的颅骨和低电阻的脑脊液(CSF)所包围,这使得提取内部电阻率信息更加困难。为了寻找一种更适合脑EIT的单源驱动模式,我们构建了一个更逼真的实验装置,该装置模拟了具有头皮、颅骨、脑脊液和大脑电阻率的头部,并基于边界电压动态范围、独立测量次数、总边界电压变化和抗噪声性能,比较了相邻、交叉、极性和伪极性驱动模式的性能。结果表明,伪极性驱动模式在除动态范围外的所有方面都是最优的。极性和交叉驱动模式次之,相邻驱动模式最差。因此,脑EIT应选择伪极性驱动模式。