Suppr超能文献

晚期子宫内膜癌全腹照射与联合化疗生活质量的随机试验结果:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究

Randomized trial results of quality of life comparing whole abdominal irradiation and combination chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: A gynecologic oncology group study.

作者信息

Bruner Deborah Watkins, Barsevick Andrea, Tian Chunqiao, Randall Marcus, Mannel Robert, Cohn David E, Sorosky Joel, Spirtos Nick M

机构信息

Department of Population Science and Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2007 Feb;16(1):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9003-5. Epub 2006 Oct 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare quality of life (QOL) outcomes in patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) or doxorubicin-cisplatin (AP) chemotherapy.

METHODS

Using the Fatigue Scale (FS), Assessment of Peripheral Neuropathy (APN), Functional Alterations due to Changes in Elimination (FACE), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), QOL was measured at: pre-treatment, end of treatment (EOT), and 3 and 6 months post-treatment.

RESULTS

317 of 396 eligible patients provided a baseline QOL assessment. The AP arm produced a statistically significant survival benefit along with greater toxicities, including peripheral neuropathy persisting up to 6 months. WAI patients reported worse FS (p < 0.001) and FACE (p < 0.001) scores at EOT and poorer FACE scores 3 months post-treatment (p = 0.004) compared to AP patients. APN scores were significantly worse among AP patients at EOT, and 3 and 6 months post-treatment (p < 0.001 for all). There is no indication that FACT-G scores differed between the two arms at any assessment point.

CONCLUSIONS

The trade-off for increased survival with AP is its potential for clinically significant peripheral neuropathy. This should be discussed with patients, particularly those who work with their hands or on their feet, in weighing therapeutic choices. Further research is needed to manage side effects having an enduring impact on QOL.

摘要

目的

前瞻性比较接受全腹照射(WAI)或阿霉素-顺铂(AP)化疗的晚期子宫内膜癌患者的生活质量(QOL)结果。

方法

使用疲劳量表(FS)、周围神经病变评估(APN)、排泄变化导致的功能改变(FACE)以及癌症治疗通用功能评估(FACT-G),在治疗前、治疗结束时(EOT)以及治疗后3个月和6个月测量生活质量。

结果

396名符合条件的患者中有317名提供了基线生活质量评估。AP组在生存方面有统计学显著益处,但毒性更大,包括持续长达6个月的周围神经病变。与AP组患者相比,WAI组患者在EOT时的FS评分(p < 0.001)和FACE评分(p < 0.001)更差,且在治疗后3个月时FACE评分更差(p = 0.004)。AP组患者在EOT时以及治疗后3个月和6个月时的APN评分显著更差(所有p < 0.001)。没有迹象表明在任何评估点两组之间的FACT-G评分存在差异。

结论

AP化疗增加生存率的代价是其有产生具有临床意义的周围神经病变的可能性。在权衡治疗选择时,应与患者,特别是那些从事手工或体力劳动的患者进行讨论。需要进一步研究来管理对生活质量有持久影响的副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验