Mendoza Tito R, Wang Xin Shelley, Williams Loretta A, Shi Qiuling, Vichaya Elisabeth G, Dougherty Patrick M, Thomas Sheeba K, Yucel Emre, Bastida Christel C, Woodruff Jeanie F, Cleeland Charles S
Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
J Pain. 2015 Oct;16(10):1032-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
Various sensory and motor effects are associated with cancer treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy. The current method for capturing the multifaceted nature of neuropathy includes a combination of objective tests, clinician evaluation, and subjective patient report, an approach that is often not logistically feasible, especially for multisite trials. We report the performance of a brief yet comprehensive, easily administered measure, the Treatment-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale (TNAS), for assessing the severity and course of neuropathy across various cancer treatments. Data were derived from 4 longitudinal or cross-sectional patient cohorts (N = 573). Patients with multiple myeloma treated primarily with bortezomib and patients with colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin evaluated candidate items. Cognitive debriefing showed that all items were easy to understand, and this preliminary TNAS demonstrated reliability, validity, and sensitivity. Numbness/tingling was the most severe item, regardless of therapeutic agent. Although numbness and general pain were moderately correlated, patients perceived them as distinct. Most TNAS items were more severe at follow-up, demonstrating the sensitivity of the instrument to accumulating dose. The TNAS will be refined with further patient input, with final psychometric evaluation conducted in a new patient sample receiving treatments known to be associated with peripheral neuropathy. The nonpainful component of neuropathy may be more disabling than the pain component.
Our data suggest that the nonpainful components of neuropathy may be more disabling than the pain component during cancer treatment. Here we report data on sensory and motor symptoms reported by patients receiving neurotoxic cancer therapy, and we detail the development of a neuropathy assessment scale that follows regulatory guidance for patient-reported outcomes.
各种感觉和运动效应与癌症治疗引起的周围神经病变相关。目前用于捕捉神经病变多方面性质的方法包括客观测试、临床医生评估和患者主观报告相结合,这种方法在后勤方面往往不可行,尤其是对于多中心试验。我们报告了一种简短而全面、易于实施的测量方法——治疗引起的神经病变评估量表(TNAS)的性能,用于评估各种癌症治疗中神经病变的严重程度和病程。数据来自4个纵向或横断面患者队列(N = 573)。主要接受硼替佐米治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者和接受奥沙利铂治疗的结直肠癌患者对候选项目进行了评估。认知反馈表明所有项目都易于理解,这种初步的TNAS表现出了可靠性、有效性和敏感性。无论使用何种治疗药物麻木/刺痛都是最严重的项目。尽管麻木和全身疼痛中度相关,但患者认为它们是不同的症状。大多数TNAS项目在随访时更为严重,表明该工具对累积剂量具有敏感性。TNAS将根据患者的进一步反馈进行完善,并在接受已知与周围神经病变相关治疗的新患者样本中进行最终心理测量评估。神经病变的非疼痛成分可能比疼痛成分更具致残性。
我们的数据表明在癌症治疗期间神经病变的非疼痛成分可能比疼痛成分更具致残性。在这里,我们报告了接受神经毒性癌症治疗的患者报告的感觉和运动症状的数据,并详细介绍了一种遵循患者报告结果监管指南的神经病变评估量表的开发情况。