Mutsuddi Mousumi, Morris Derek W, Waggoner Skye G, Daly Mark J, Scolnick Edward M, Sklar Pamela
Psychiatric Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Nov;79(5):903-9. doi: 10.1086/508942. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
DTNBP1 was first identified as a putative schizophrenia-susceptibility gene in Irish pedigrees, with a report of association to common genetic variation. Several replication studies have reported confirmation of an association to DTNBP1 in independent European samples; however, reported risk alleles and haplotypes appear to differ between studies, and comparison among studies has been confounded because different marker sets were employed by each group. To facilitate evaluation of existing evidence of association and further work, we supplemented the extensive genotype data, available through the International HapMap Project (HapMap), about DTNBP1 by specifically typing all associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms reported in each of the studies of the Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH)-derived HapMap sample (CEU). Using this high-density reference map, we compared the putative disease-associated haplotype from each study and found that the association studies are inconsistent with regard to the identity of the disease-associated haplotype at DTNBP1. Specifically, all five "replication" studies define a positively associated haplotype that is different from the association originally reported. We further demonstrate that, in all six studies, the European-derived populations studied have haplotype patterns and frequencies that are consistent with HapMap CEU samples (and each other). Thus, it is unlikely that population differences are creating the inconsistency of the association studies. Evidence of association is, at present, equivocal and unsatisfactory. The new dense map of the region may be valuable in more-comprehensive follow-up studies.
DTNBP1最初在爱尔兰家系中被鉴定为一个假定的精神分裂症易感基因,并报告了与常见基因变异的关联。多项重复研究报告在独立的欧洲样本中证实了与DTNBP1的关联;然而,不同研究报告的风险等位基因和单倍型似乎有所不同,且由于每组使用的标记集不同,研究之间的比较受到了干扰。为便于评估现有的关联证据及进一步开展研究,我们通过对人类多态性研究中心(CEPH)衍生的国际人类基因组单体型图计划(HapMap)样本(CEU)的每项研究中报告的所有相关单核苷酸多态性进行特异性分型,补充了关于DTNBP1的大量基因型数据。利用这一高密度参考图谱,我们比较了每项研究中假定的疾病相关单倍型,发现关联研究在DTNBP1疾病相关单倍型的一致性方面存在差异。具体而言,所有五项“重复”研究确定的正相关单倍型均与最初报告的关联不同。我们进一步证明,在所有六项研究中,所研究的欧洲衍生人群的单倍型模式和频率与HapMap CEU样本(以及彼此之间)一致。因此,人群差异不太可能导致关联研究结果不一致。目前,关联证据模棱两可且不尽人意。该区域的新密集图谱可能对更全面的后续研究具有重要价值。