Suppr超能文献

Farnsworth-Munsell 100色觉测试的终盒评分伪差评估

End-box scoring artefact evaluation of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue colour vision test.

作者信息

Viliūnas V, Lukauskiene R, Svegzda A, Zukauskas A

机构信息

Institute of Materials Science and Applied Research, Vilnius University, Sauletekio al. 9-III, Vilnius, LT-10222, Lithuania.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Nov;26(6):580-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00411.x.

Abstract

The scoring artefact in the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test, arising from the grouping of the caps into four boxes, was investigated. The traditional method of scoring performed with the numbers of the anchor caps disregarded and the alternative scoring performed with the numbers of the anchor caps employed, were compared. For the traditional method of scoring, we revealed an increase of the error score of the outside (end-box) caps when the total error score was above 240. On the contrary for scoring performed with the numbers of the anchor caps employed, the difference between the error score of the outside caps and the average error per cap is not significant. To mitigate the end-box artefact and to improve the reliability of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test, corrections to the traditional method of scoring are proposed.

摘要

研究了在 Farnsworth-Munsell 100 色调测试中因将瓶盖分组放入四个盒子而产生的评分假象。比较了不考虑定位瓶盖编号的传统评分方法和采用定位瓶盖编号的替代评分方法。对于传统评分方法,我们发现当总误差分数高于 240 时,外侧(端盒)瓶盖的误差分数会增加。相反,对于采用定位瓶盖编号进行的评分,外侧瓶盖的误差分数与每个瓶盖的平均误差之间的差异并不显著。为了减轻端盒假象并提高 Farnsworth-Munsell 100 色调测试的可靠性,提出了对传统评分方法的修正。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验