de Barbeyrac B, Obeniche F, Ratsima E, Labrouche S, Moraté C, Renaudin H, Pereyre S, Bébéar C M, Bébéar C
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre National de Référence des Infections à Chlamydia, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Bordeaux.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2006 Sep-Oct;64(5):409-19.
The diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection can be based either on direct detection of the organism or its components or indirectly by measuring antibodies as markers of the individual's response to the infection. The latter is currently of limited value. Neither IgG or IgA antibodies can be used to diagnose current genital infection by Chlamydia trachomatis or to exclude such an infection. There is no solid ground as yet for the use of IgA antibodies as a marker of persistant or unresolved infection. Commercial tests in the Elisa format based on peptides from the MOMP of Chlamydia trachomatis are available and show good specificities and sensitivities. Hsp60 seems to have a unique role in the development of tubal scarring and antibodies to chsp60 could predict tubal factor infertility. Serology is the main diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. The serologic assays are the complement fixation test (CF), immunofluorescence, the microparticle agglutination and recently EIAs. The CF test is still used for serodiagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection because of the sensitivity of 90%. Single titer of >or= 64 are considered to be indicative of recent infection. A number of commercial EIAs have been developped. The difficulty for IgG interpretation is a definition of a cutoff value for discriminating infected and healthy subjects. Most of the IgM assays show good diagnostic sensitivities and are valuable tools for the early diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children. There are no wholly satisfactory serological methods for diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Problems arise from the high background of IgG antibody prevalence, the lack of standardized testing methods.
沙眼衣原体感染的诊断可基于对病原体或其成分的直接检测,或通过检测抗体间接进行,后者作为个体对感染反应的标志物。目前,后者的价值有限。IgG或IgA抗体均不能用于诊断当前沙眼衣原体引起的生殖器感染,也不能排除此类感染。目前尚无充分依据将IgA抗体用作持续性或未愈感染的标志物。基于沙眼衣原体主要外膜蛋白(MOMP)肽段的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)商业检测方法已经问世,且具有良好的特异性和敏感性。热休克蛋白60(Hsp60)似乎在输卵管瘢痕形成过程中具有独特作用,抗Hsp60抗体可预测输卵管因素导致的不孕。血清学检测是诊断肺炎支原体感染的主要诊断工具。血清学检测方法包括补体结合试验(CF)、免疫荧光法、微粒凝集试验以及最近的酶免疫测定法(EIA)。由于CF试验的敏感性达90%,目前仍用于肺炎支原体感染的血清学诊断。单滴度≥64被认为提示近期感染。已经开发出多种商业EIA检测方法。IgG检测结果判读的难点在于确定区分感染与未感染个体的临界值。大多数IgM检测方法具有良好的诊断敏感性,是儿童肺炎支原体感染早期诊断的重要工具。目前尚无完全令人满意的血清学方法用于诊断肺炎衣原体感染。问题源于IgG抗体高流行率背景以及缺乏标准化检测方法。