Rachiotis George, Savani Rashna, Brant Andrew, MacNeill Stephanie J, Newman Taylor Anthony, Cullinan Paul
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Imperial College (NHLI), 1b Manresa Road, London SW3 6LR, UK.
Thorax. 2007 Feb;62(2):147-52. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.061952. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
Patients with occupational asthma, and their medical advisers, need valid information about the prognosis of their disease.
A systematic review of the published literature on the symptomatic and functional outcomes of occupational asthma was carried out after avoidance of exposure to the causative agent. Through a full search of electronic and bibliographic sources, original studies documenting complete recovery from asthma (n = 39,1681 patients) or improvement in non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness (NSBHR; n = 28,695 patients) were identified. The median duration of follow-up was 31 (range 6-240) months for studies of symptomatic recovery and 37 (6-240) months for studies of NSBHR. Most studies were of patients recruited from special clinics.
Reported rates of symptomatic recovery varied from 0% to 100%, with a pooled estimate of 32% (95% CI 26% to 38%). These rates were lower with increasing age (p = 0.019) and among clinic based populations (p = 0.053). Patients with the shortest durations of exposure (< or =76 months) had the highest rate of recovery (36%; 95% CI 25% to 50%), but the effect was not linear. The pooled prevalence of persistent NSBHR at follow-up was 73% (95% CI 66% to 79%). This figure was higher among patients whose disease was due to high-molecular-weight agents (p = 0.006) and, less clearly, those from clinic-based populations (p = 0.561). In between-study comparisons, no clear patterns of improvement relating to total duration of exposure or follow-up were found. From within-study comparisons there was some evidence that a shorter duration of symptoms was associated with a higher rate of symptomatic recovery.
The available data on the prognosis of occupational asthma are insufficiently consistent to allow confident advice to be given to patients with the disease. Clinicians and epidemiologists with an interest in this disease should consider a collaborative and carefully standardised study of the prognosis of occupational asthma.
职业性哮喘患者及其医疗顾问需要有关该疾病预后的有效信息。
在避免接触致病因子后,对已发表的关于职业性哮喘症状和功能转归的文献进行系统评价。通过全面检索电子和文献资源,确定了记录哮喘完全康复(n = 39,1681例患者)或非特异性支气管高反应性(NSBHR)改善(n = 28,695例患者)的原始研究。症状恢复研究的中位随访时间为31(范围6 - 240)个月,NSBHR研究的中位随访时间为37(6 - 240)个月。大多数研究的患者是从专科诊所招募的。
报告的症状恢复率从0%到100%不等,汇总估计为32%(95%CI 26%至38%)。这些比率随着年龄增长(p = 0.019)以及在基于诊所的人群中(p = 0.053)而降低。接触时间最短(≤76个月)的患者恢复率最高(36%;95%CI 25%至50%),但这种影响不是线性的。随访时持续性NSBHR的汇总患病率为73%(95%CI 66%至79%)。该数字在因高分子量物质致病的患者中更高(p = 0.006),而在基于诊所人群中的情况不太明显(p = 0.561)。在研究间比较中,未发现与接触总时长或随访相关的明确改善模式。在研究内比较中,有一些证据表明症状持续时间较短与症状恢复率较高相关。
关于职业性哮喘预后的现有数据一致性不足,无法向该疾病患者提供可靠建议。对该疾病感兴趣的临床医生和流行病学家应考虑对职业性哮喘的预后进行协作且精心标准化的研究。