• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估自付费用的累进性:以马来西亚为例。

Assessing progressivity of out-of-pocket payment: with illustration to Malaysia.

作者信息

Yu Chai Ping, Whynes David K, Sach Tracey H

机构信息

Trent Research and Development Support Unit, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2006 Jul-Sep;21(3):193-210. doi: 10.1002/hpm.845.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.845
PMID:17044546
Abstract

Throughout the world, policy makers are considering or implementing financing strategies that are likely to have a substantial impact on the equity of health financing. The assessment of the equity implication is clearly important, given the potential impact that alternative finance sources have on households. Households incur out-of-pocket payment directly from their budget, apart from their public or private insurance. Out-of-pocket payment is the primary concern, given their undesirable impact on households. Progressivity measures departures from proportionality in the relationship between out-of-pocket payment and ability to pay. It is the most frequently used yardstick to assess the equity of out-of-pocket payments in empirical studies. This paper provides an evaluation of such progressivity measures, undertaken using four approaches (proportion approach, tabulation approach, concentration curve and Kakwani's index), in order to reveal their usefulness and underlying notion. It is illustrated empirically with data on out-of-pocket payment for health care in Malaysia for 1998/ 1999, based on the nationally representative Household Expenditure Survey. Results indicate that out-of-pocket payments are mildly progressive, whilst the four approaches have their benefits and limitations in assessing equity implications. This analysis is of interest from a policy perspective, given Malaysia's heavy reliance on out-of-pocket payments to finance health care.

摘要

在全球范围内,政策制定者正在考虑或实施可能对卫生筹资公平性产生重大影响的筹资战略。鉴于不同融资来源对家庭可能产生的影响,对公平性影响的评估显然至关重要。除了公共或私人保险外,家庭需直接从其预算中支付自付费用。鉴于自付费用对家庭产生的不良影响,它是主要关注点。累进性衡量自付费用与支付能力之间关系偏离比例的程度。在实证研究中,它是评估自付费用公平性最常用的标准。本文对使用四种方法(比例法、列表法、集中曲线法和卡克瓦尼指数法)进行的此类累进性衡量进行评估,以揭示其有用性和基本概念。基于具有全国代表性的家庭支出调查,用1998/1999年马来西亚医疗保健自付费用数据进行了实证说明。结果表明,自付费用呈轻度累进性,而这四种方法在评估公平性影响方面各有优缺点。鉴于马来西亚严重依赖自付费用为医疗保健筹资,从政策角度来看,这一分析具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Assessing progressivity of out-of-pocket payment: with illustration to Malaysia.评估自付费用的累进性:以马来西亚为例。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2006 Jul-Sep;21(3):193-210. doi: 10.1002/hpm.845.
2
Equity in health care financing: The case of Malaysia.医疗保健融资中的公平性:以马来西亚为例。
Int J Equity Health. 2008 Jun 9;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-15.
3
Equity in out-of-pocket payment in Chile.智利自付费用的公平性。
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 May 4;51:44. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006666.
4
Who pays for healthcare in Bangladesh? An analysis of progressivity in health systems financing.在孟加拉国,谁来支付医疗保健费用?卫生系统筹资公平性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 6;16(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0654-3.
5
Equity in Out-of-Pocket Payments for Healthcare Services: Evidence from Malaysia.医疗服务自付费用的公平性:来自马来西亚的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4500. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084500.
6
Equity in health financing of Guangxi after China's universal health coverage: evidence based on health expenditure comparison in rural Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region from 2009 to 2013.广西全民健康覆盖后卫生筹资公平性研究:基于 2009-2013 年广西壮族自治区农村地区卫生支出比较的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 29;16(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0669-9.
7
Equitable financing, out-of-pocket payments and the role of health care reform in Colombia.公平融资、自付费用与医疗改革在哥伦比亚的作用。
Health Policy Plan. 2002 Dec;17 Suppl:5-11. doi: 10.1093/heapol/17.suppl_1.5.
8
Urban employee health insurance reform and the impact on out-of-pocket payment in China.中国城镇职工医疗保险改革及其对自费支付的影响。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2006 Jul-Sep;21(3):211-28. doi: 10.1002/hpm.846.
9
Private health expenditure in Ireland: Assessing the affordability of private financing of health care.爱尔兰的私人医疗支出:评估医疗保健私人融资的可负担性。
Health Policy. 2019 Oct;123(10):963-969. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
10
Who pays for and who benefits from health care services in Uganda?乌干达的医疗保健服务由谁付费,谁从中受益?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 1;15:44. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0683-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in private health service utilisation and access to the Italian National Health Service between 2006 and 2019: a cross-sectional comparative study.2006 年至 2019 年期间私人医疗服务利用和获得意大利国家卫生服务的变化:一项横断面比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 29;13(5):e070975. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070975.
2
Equity in Out-of-Pocket Payments for Healthcare Services: Evidence from Malaysia.医疗服务自付费用的公平性:来自马来西亚的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4500. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084500.
3
Improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in Mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards.
提高毛里求斯卫生服务分配和筹资的公平性,毛里求斯是一个小岛国,具有根深蒂固的福利国家标准。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006757.
4
Postoperative Rehabilitation May Reduce the Risk of Readmission After Groin Hernia Repair.术后康复可降低腹股沟疝修补术后再入院风险。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 30;8(1):6759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25276-0.
5
Equity in Health Care Financing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Studies Using Benefit and Financing Incidence Analyses.低收入和中等收入国家医疗保健筹资公平性:对使用受益和筹资发生率分析的研究证据的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0152866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152866. eCollection 2016.
6
Measuring equity in household's health care payments (Tehran-Iran 2013): technical points for health policy decision makers.衡量家庭医疗保健支付的公平性(伊朗德黑兰,2013年):卫生政策决策者的技术要点
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Aug 10;29:246. eCollection 2015.
7
Out-of-pocket payments in the Austrian healthcare system - a distributional analysis.奥地利医疗保健系统中的自付费用——一项分布分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Oct 14;14:94. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0230-7.
8
Assessment of equity in healthcare financing in Fiji and Timor-Leste: a study protocol.斐济和东帝汶医疗保健融资公平性评估:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 2;4(12):e006806. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006806.
9
Out-of-pocket expenditures for hospital care in Iran: who is at risk of incurring catastrophic payments?伊朗医院护理的自付费用:谁面临高额自付费用的风险?
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2011 Dec;11(4):267-85. doi: 10.1007/s10754-011-9099-1. Epub 2011 Sep 14.