Kwesiga Brendan, Ataguba John E, Abewe Christabel, Kizza Paul, Zikusooka Charlotte M
HealthNet Consult, P.O. Box 35928, Kampala, Uganda.
Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, South Africa.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 1;15:44. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0683-9.
Equity in health care entails payment for health services according to the capacity to pay and the receipt of benefits according to need. In Uganda, as in many African countries, although equity is extolled in government policy documents, not much is known about who pays for, and who benefits from, health services. This paper assesses both equity in the financing and distribution of health care benefits in Uganda.
Data are drawn from the most recent nationally representative Uganda National Household Survey 2009/10. Equity in health financing is assessed considering the main domestic health financing sources (i.e., taxes and direct out-of-pocket payments). This is achieved using bar charts and standard concentration and Kakwani indices. Benefit incidence analysis is used to assess the distribution of health services for both public and non-public providers across socio-economic groups and the need for care. Need is assessed using limitations in functional ability while socioeconomic groups are created using per adult equivalent consumption expenditure.
Overall, health financing in Uganda is marginally progressive; the rich pay more as a proportion of their income than the poor. The various taxes are more progressive than out-of-pocket payments (e.g., the Kakwani index of personal income tax is 0.195 compared with 0.064 for out-of-pocket payments). However, taxes are a much smaller proportion of total health sector financing compared with out-of-pocket payments. The distribution of total health sector services benefitsis pro-rich. The richest quintile receives 19.2% of total benefits compared to the 17.9% received by the poorest quintile. The rich also receive a much higher share of benefits relative to their need. Benefits from public health units are pro-poor while hospital based care, in both public and non-public sectors are pro-rich.
There is a renewed interest in ensuring equity in the financing and use of health services. Based on the results in this paper, it would seem that in order to safeguard such equity, there is a need for policy that focuses on addressing the health needs of the poor while continuing to ensure that the burden of financing health services does not rest disproportionately on the poor.
医疗保健公平性要求根据支付能力支付医疗服务费用,并根据需求获得福利。在乌干达,和许多非洲国家一样,尽管政府政策文件中推崇公平性,但对于谁支付医疗服务费用以及谁从医疗服务中受益,人们了解得并不多。本文评估了乌干达医疗保健福利融资和分配的公平性。
数据取自最近具有全国代表性的2009/10年乌干达全国住户调查。考虑主要的国内医疗融资来源(即税收和直接自付费用)来评估医疗融资的公平性。这通过柱状图以及标准集中度和卡克瓦尼指数来实现。受益发生率分析用于评估公共和非公共提供者提供的医疗服务在社会经济群体中的分配情况以及护理需求。使用功能能力受限情况评估需求,同时使用人均消费支出创建社会经济群体。
总体而言,乌干达的医疗融资略显累进;富人作为收入的一部分支付的费用比穷人更多。各种税收比自付费用更具累进性(例如,个人所得税的卡克瓦尼指数为0.195,而自付费用为0.064)。然而,与自付费用相比,税收在医疗部门总融资中所占比例要小得多。医疗部门服务总福利的分配有利于富人。最富有的五分之一人口获得了总福利的19.2%,而最贫穷的五分之一人口获得了17.9%。相对于需求而言,富人获得的福利份额也高得多。公共卫生单位的福利有利于穷人,而公共和非公共部门基于医院的护理则有利于富人。
人们对确保医疗服务融资和使用的公平性重新产生了兴趣。根据本文的结果,为了保障这种公平性,似乎需要一项政策,该政策既要关注满足穷人的健康需求,同时也要继续确保医疗服务融资负担不会过度落在穷人身上。