• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用锁定管心针和鞘管进行血管内导线拔除术。

Intravascular lead extraction using locking stylets and sheaths.

作者信息

Byrd C L, Schwartz S J, Hedin N B, Goode L B, Fearnot N E, Smith H J

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1871-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06906.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06906.x
PMID:1704557
Abstract

Chronic lead extraction using intravascular countertraction techniques was studied in patients with over 65 different lead models including passive and active fixation devices. Indications for removal of 115 leads implanted 5 days to 264 months (mean 58 months) in 62 patients (mean 65 years) included septicemia, subcutaneous tissue infection, preerosion, free-floating lead, lead trapped in valve, too many leads, pain, and vein thrombosis. The superior vena cava (SVC) approach was attempted in 101 leads and was successful in 82 attempts (71% of total leads). The inferior vena cava (IVC) approach via the femoral vein was required to extract 14 (12%) leads inaccessible to the SVC approach and the 19 leads that failed the SVC approach (29% of total leads). The SVC procedure includes a sized stylet locked at the tip and telescoping sheaths advanced over the lead to the heart. An IVC procedure includes placement of a 16 F sheath workstation via a femoral vein into the right atrium. A deflection catheter and Dotter snare in an 11 F sheath were advanced through the workstation into the right atrium. The lead was maneuvered into position, snared, and pulled into the workstation. For both the SVC and IVC approaches, the leads were removed by applying traction on the lead and countertraction with the sheaths. In experienced hands, these techniques have proven safe and effective for removing chronic transvenous leads.

摘要

采用血管内反向牵引技术对65种以上不同型号导线(包括被动和主动固定装置)的患者进行慢性导线拔除研究。62例患者(平均65岁)植入的115根导线(植入时间为5天至264个月,平均58个月)的拔除指征包括败血症、皮下组织感染、预侵蚀、漂浮导线、导线被困于瓣膜、导线过多、疼痛和静脉血栓形成。对101根导线尝试采用上腔静脉(SVC)入路,82次尝试成功(占导线总数的71%)。对于14根(12%)无法用上腔静脉入路拔除的导线以及19根上腔静脉入路失败的导线(占导线总数的29%),需要通过股静脉采用下腔静脉(IVC)入路拔除。上腔静脉操作包括在尖端锁定一根尺寸合适的探条,并将伸缩鞘管沿导线推进至心脏。下腔静脉操作包括通过股静脉将一个16F鞘管工作站置入右心房。将一个偏转导管和置于11F鞘管中的Dotter圈套器通过工作站推进至右心房。将导线调整至合适位置,套住并拉回工作站。对于上腔静脉和下腔静脉入路,通过对导线施加牵引力并利用鞘管进行反向牵引来拔除导线。在经验丰富的医生手中,这些技术已被证明对于拔除慢性经静脉导线安全有效。

相似文献

1
Intravascular lead extraction using locking stylets and sheaths.使用锁定管心针和鞘管进行血管内导线拔除术。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1871-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06906.x.
2
Intravascular lead extraction using locking stylets, sheaths, and other techniques.使用锁定管芯、鞘管及其他技术进行血管内导线拔除。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1864-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06905.x.
3
Intravascular techniques for extraction of permanent pacemaker leads.用于拔除永久性起搏器导线的血管内技术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Jun;101(6):989-97.
4
Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.
Curr Opin Cardiol. 1999 Jan;14(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/00001573-199901000-00008.
5
Ancillary tools in pacemaker and defibrillator lead extraction using a novel lead removal system.使用新型导线移除系统进行起搏器和除颤器导线拔除的辅助工具。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Mar;24(3):282-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00282.x.
6
Pacemaker lead extraction with the needle's eye snare for countertraction via a femoral approach.经股动脉途径使用针眼圈套器进行起搏器导线拔除以提供反向牵引。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;25(7):1023-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01023.x.
7
Chronic transvenous pacemaker lead removal using a unique, sequential transvenous system.使用独特的序贯经静脉系统进行慢性经静脉起搏器导线拔除。
Am J Cardiol. 1990 Oct 15;66(12):964-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90934-s.
8
Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia.使用导线锁定装置系统进行心脏植入式电子设备导线拔除:借助机械工具和局部麻醉,使其操作简便、安全且成本低廉。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;18(4):289-295. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
9
Simultaneous lead traction from above and below: A novel technique to reduce the risk of superior vena cava injury during transvenous lead extraction.上下同时牵引导丝:一种降低经静脉导线拔除术中上腔静脉损伤风险的新方法。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Nov;15(11):1655-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
Pacemaker and defibrillator lead extraction: predictors of mortality during follow-up.起搏器和除颤器导线拔除:随访期间死亡率的预测因素。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;33(2):209-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02601.x. Epub 2009 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Corrosion and Ion Release in 304L Stainless Steel Biomedical Stylets.304L不锈钢生物医学探针的腐蚀与离子释放
Materials (Basel). 2025 Aug 11;18(16):3769. doi: 10.3390/ma18163769.
2
In-Hospital and Midterm Outcomes of Lead Extraction: A Single-Center Clinical Study.导线拔除的院内及中期结局:一项单中心临床研究
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2024 Jan;19(1):25-30. doi: 10.18502/jthc.v19i1.15533.
3
Transvenous Lead Extraction: Work in Progress.经静脉导线拔除术:进展中的工作。
Eur Cardiol. 2023 Jun 19;18:e44. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2023.06. eCollection 2023.
4
Safety and Efficacy of a Single Procedure of Extraction and Reimplantation of Infected Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) in Comparison with Deferral Timing: An Observational Retrospective Multicentric Study.与延期时机相比,感染性心血管植入式电子设备(CIED)单次取出与重新植入手术的安全性和有效性:一项观察性回顾性多中心研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;12(6):1001. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12061001.
5
Unexpected Procedure Difficulties Increasing the Complexity of Transvenous Lead Extraction: The Single Centre Experience with 3721 Procedures.意外的手术困难增加经静脉导线拔除的复杂性:3721例手术的单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 11;12(8):2811. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082811.
6
Transvenous Lead Extraction in Adult Patient with Leads Implanted in Childhood-Is That the Same Procedure as in Other Adult Patients?成人患者经静脉心内膜导线拔除术——与其他成年患者的操作相同吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;19(21):14594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114594.
7
Safety and Effectiveness of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Infected Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Is It More Risky than Extraction of Other Systems?经静脉心脏再同步治疗装置感染患者的安全性和有效性;与其他系统相比,其风险是否更高?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 10;19(10):5803. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105803.
8
Transvenous Lead Extraction without Procedure-Related Deaths in 1000 Consecutive Patients: A Single-Center Experience.1000 例连续患者经静脉导线拔除术:无相关程序死亡的单中心经验。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021 Aug 5;17:445-459. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S318205. eCollection 2021.
9
Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads.非常陈旧心内导线经静脉途径安全有效拔除。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):402-407. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa278.
10
Transvenous Lead Extraction via the Inferior Approach Using a Gooseneck Snare versus Simple Manual Traction.经下腔途径使用鹅颈圈套器与单纯手动牵引进行经静脉导线拔除术的比较
Korean Circ J. 2016 Mar;46(2):186-96. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.2.186. Epub 2016 Mar 21.