Suppr超能文献

非常陈旧心内导线经静脉途径安全有效拔除。

Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):402-407. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa278.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Transvenous lead extraction using mechanical rotational- or laser sheaths is an established procedure. Lead dwell time has been recognized as a risk factor for extraction failure and procedure-related complications. We therefore investigated the safety and efficacy of transvenous extraction of leads with an implant duration of more than 10 years.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and March 2017, a total of 403 patients underwent lead extraction in 2 high-volume lead extraction centres. One hundred and fifty-four patients with extraction of at least 1 lead aged over 10 years were included in this analysis. Laser lead extraction was the primary extraction method, with additional use of mechanical rotational sheaths or femoral snares, if necessary. All procedural- and patient-based data were collected into a database and retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Mean patient's age was 65.8 ± 15.8 years, 68.2% were male. Three hundred and sixty-two leads had to be extracted. The mean lead dwell time of treated leads was 14.0 ± 6.1 years. Complete procedural success was achieved in 91.6% of cases, while clinical success was achieved in 96.8%. Failure of extraction occurred in 3.2%. Leads that could not be completely removed had a significantly longer lead dwell time (18.2 vs 13.2 years; P = 0.016). Additional mechanical rotational sheaths or femoral snares were used in 26 (16.9%) patients. Overall complication rate was 4.6%, including 5 (3.3%) major and 2 (1.3%) minor complications. There was no procedure-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvenous lead extraction in leads aged over 10 years is safe and effective when performed in specialized centres and with use of multiple tools and techniques. Leads that could not be completely extracted had a statistically significant longer lead dwell time.

摘要

目的

经静脉使用机械旋转或激光鞘进行心内导线拔除术是一种已确立的方法。导线留置时间已被认为是拔除失败和与手术相关并发症的危险因素。因此,我们研究了植入时间超过 10 年的导线经静脉拔除的安全性和有效性。

方法

2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月期间,共有 403 名患者在 2 个高容量的导线拔除中心接受了导线拔除术。这项分析纳入了 154 名至少有 1 根植入时间超过 10 年的导线拔除患者。激光导线拔除是主要的拔除方法,如果需要,还会额外使用机械旋转鞘或股静脉套索。所有手术和患者相关的数据都被收集到一个数据库中,并进行了回顾性分析。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 65.8±15.8 岁,68.2%为男性。需要拔除 362 根导线。治疗导线的平均留置时间为 14.0±6.1 年。91.6%的病例达到了完全手术成功,96.8%达到了临床成功。拔除失败的发生率为 3.2%。无法完全拔除的导线留置时间明显更长(18.2 年比 13.2 年;P=0.016)。26 名(16.9%)患者额外使用了机械旋转鞘或股静脉套索。总的并发症发生率为 4.6%,包括 5 例(3.3%)主要并发症和 2 例(1.3%)次要并发症。没有与手术相关的死亡。

结论

在专门中心进行并使用多种工具和技术时,对于植入时间超过 10 年的导线进行经静脉导线拔除术是安全且有效的。无法完全拔除的导线留置时间有统计学上的显著延长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877b/8906697/66ff0d909f55/ivaa278f2.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验