Orwig Denise, Brandt Nicole, Gruber-Baldini Ann L
Division of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 660 West Redwood Street, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Gerontologist. 2006 Oct;46(5):661-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.5.661.
The purpose of this study was to describe the Medication Management Instrument for Deficiencies in the Elderly (MedMaIDE) and to provide results of reliability and validity testing.
Participants were 50 older adults, aged 65 and older, who lived in the community, took at least one prescription medication, and were then self-medicating. Nonmedical study staff assessed participants in their homes at baseline and 1 week, and a study pharmacist conducted pill counts at baseline and 30 days. The MedMaIDE covers three domains important for ensuring medication compliance (knowledge of medications, how to take medications, and procurement) and yields a total deficiency score. We assessed test-retest and interrater reliability. We assessed validity by comparing the MedMaIDE deficiency scores to 30-day pill count compliance.
The sample was mostly female (72%) and White (56%), with a mean age of 78. Participants were taking an average of 7 prescription drugs, with an average pill count compliance of 70%. The MedMaIDE had very good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.93) and good interrater reliability (ICC = 0.74). Internal consistency was also strong (Cronbach's alpha = .71). Comparing the MedMaIDE to the pill count with those who were compliant (>80%) versus those that were not, the agreement was 75%. The MedMaIDE was more highly specific and predictive of compliance compared to the pill count.
The MedMaIDE appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for determining if an older adult has deficiencies in managing medications.
本研究旨在描述老年人用药管理缺陷评估工具(MedMaIDE),并提供可靠性和有效性测试结果。
研究对象为50名65岁及以上的老年人,他们居住在社区,至少服用一种处方药且自行用药。非医学研究人员在基线期和1周时对参与者进行居家评估,研究药剂师在基线期和30天时进行药品计数。MedMaIDE涵盖确保用药依从性的三个重要领域(药物知识、用药方法和采购),并得出总缺陷分数。我们评估了重测信度和评分者间信度。通过将MedMaIDE缺陷分数与30天药品计数依从性进行比较来评估有效性。
样本中女性占多数(72%),白人占56%,平均年龄为78岁。参与者平均服用7种处方药,平均药品计数依从性为70%。MedMaIDE具有非常好的重测信度(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.93)和良好的评分者间信度(ICC=0.74)。内部一致性也很强(Cronbach's alpha=.71)。将MedMaIDE与药品计数进行比较,依从性好(>80%)与依从性不好的参与者相比,一致性为75%。与药品计数相比,MedMaIDE对依从性的特异性和预测性更高。
MedMaIDE似乎是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于确定老年人在用药管理方面是否存在缺陷。