• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊医学、器官捐赠与《人体组织法》

Emergency medicine, organ donation and the Human Tissue Act.

作者信息

Bell M D D

机构信息

The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2006 Nov;23(11):824-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.036749.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2006.036749
PMID:17057130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2464374/
Abstract

The Human Tissue Act 2004, which governs all activity relating to the human body, organs or tissues, is grounded in the principle of fully informed consent in line with societal expectations. The associated intention to deal with the current deficit of transplantable organs has paradoxically been translated into the legitimisation of non-consensual organ preservation manoeuvres after death. The procurement strategy targeted under this new statute is "uncontrolled" non-heart-beating donation, and the clinical arenas would be accident and emergency departments and acute medical wards. Practitioners in these fields need to have an understanding of the process and the associated ethical, logistical and legal hurdles to defensible implementation. In the light of these hurdles, there is an obvious need for more widespread professional and public consultation before adoption of this programme.

摘要

2004年的《人体组织法》对所有与人体、器官或组织相关的活动进行管理,该法基于符合社会期望的充分知情同意原则。处理当前可移植器官短缺问题的相关意图,却自相矛盾地转化为死后非自愿器官保存操作的合法化。根据这项新法规所针对的采购策略是“不受控制的”非心脏跳动供体捐赠,临床场所将是急诊科和急性内科病房。这些领域的从业者需要了解该过程以及可辩护实施所涉及的相关伦理、后勤和法律障碍。鉴于这些障碍,在采用该方案之前显然需要进行更广泛的专业和公众咨询。

相似文献

1
Emergency medicine, organ donation and the Human Tissue Act.急诊医学、器官捐赠与《人体组织法》
Emerg Med J. 2006 Nov;23(11):824-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.036749.
2
Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine.急诊医学中终末期器官获取的科学、法律和伦理挑战。
Resuscitation. 2010 Sep;81(9):1069-78. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
3
Increasing the supply of organs for transplantation: the role of ethics and law.
Med Staff Couns. 1990 Fall;4(4):35-44.
4
[Ethical issues raised by 2 kinds of protocols for organ donation after cardiac death: aspects particular to France, Spain and the United States].[心脏死亡后两种器官捐赠协议引发的伦理问题:法国、西班牙和美国的特殊情况]
Med Sci (Paris). 2010 Feb;26(2):209-13. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2010262209.
5
Seeking an ethical and legal way of procuring transplantable organs from the dying without further attempts to redefine human death.寻求一种道德和合法的方式,从濒死之人身上获取可移植器官,而不再进一步尝试重新定义人类死亡。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007 Jun 29;2:11. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-2-11.
6
Recovery of transplantable organs after cardiac or circulatory death: transforming the paradigm for the ethics of organ donation.心脏死亡或循环死亡后可移植器官的恢复:转变器官捐赠伦理范式
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007 May 22;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-2-8.
7
Organ procurement organizations Internet enrollment for organ donation: abandoning informed consent.器官采购组织的器官捐赠互联网登记:放弃知情同意
BMC Med Ethics. 2006 Dec 22;7:E14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-14.
8
Legal framework governing deceased organ donation in the UK.英国关于已故器官捐赠的法律框架。
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;108 Suppl 1:i68-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer356.
9
Presumed consent for organ preservation in uncontrolled donation after cardiac death in the United States: a public policy with serious consequences.美国心脏死亡后非受控捐赠中器官保存的推定同意:一项后果严重的公共政策。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2009 Sep 22;4:15. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-4-15.
10
Regulation of human tissue in the UK.
Lancet. 2016 Sep 17;388(10050):e4-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31497-0. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocols for uncontrolled donation after circulatory death: a systematic review of international guidelines, practices and transplant outcomes.《循环死亡后未控制供体捐献的方案:国际指南、实践和移植结局的系统评价》。
Crit Care. 2015 Jun 24;19(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0985-7.
2
Best interests and potential organ donors.最大利益与潜在器官捐献者。
BMJ. 2008 Jun 14;336(7657):1346-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39575.561898.94.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential for organ donation in the United Kingdom: audit of intensive care records.英国器官捐赠的潜力:重症监护记录审计
BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1124-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38804.658183.55. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
2
Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation.使用LUCAS(一种用于自动机械按压和主动减压复苏的新设备)治疗院外心脏骤停。
Resuscitation. 2005 Oct;67(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.05.013.
3
The impact of a new CPR assist device on rate of return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.一种新型心肺复苏辅助设备对院外心脏骤停患者自主循环恢复率的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Jan-Mar;9(1):61-7. doi: 10.1080/10903120590891714.
4
Non-heartbeating organ donation: clinical process and fundamental issues.非心脏跳动器官捐献:临床过程与基本问题。
Br J Anaesth. 2005 Apr;94(4):474-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei048. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
5
The human tissue bill.人体组织法案。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):533-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.533.
6
Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: Evaluation of the effects at one year.严重创伤性脑损伤的去骨瓣减压术:一年疗效评估
Crit Care Med. 2003 Oct;31(10):2535-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000089927.67396.F3.
7
Non-heart beating organ donation: old procurement strategy--new ethical problems.非心脏跳动器官捐献:旧的获取策略——新的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2003 Jun;29(3):176-81. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.3.176.
8
Kidney transplantation from donors without a heartbeat.来自无心跳供体的肾移植
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jul 25;347(4):248-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020274.
9
Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia.对院外心脏骤停昏迷幸存者进行亚低温治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 21;346(8):557-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa003289.
10
Development of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center policy for the care of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death following the removal of life support.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Jun;3(2):131-43. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0175.