Verheijde Joseph L, Rady Mohamed Y, McGregor Joan
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, Arizona 85054, USA.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007 May 22;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-2-8.
Organ donation after cardiac or circulatory death (DCD) has been introduced to increase the supply of transplantable organs. In this paper, we argue that the recovery of viable organs useful for transplantation in DCD is not compatible with the dead donor rule and we explain the consequential ethical and legal ramifications. We also outline serious deficiencies in the current consent process for DCD with respect to disclosure of necessary elements for voluntary informed decision making and respect for the donor's autonomy. We compare two alternative proposals for increasing organ donation consent in society: presumed consent and mandated choice. We conclude that proceeding with the recovery of transplantable organs from decedents requires a paradigm change in the ethics of organ donation. The paradigm change to ensure the legitimacy of DCD practice must include: (1) societal agreement on abandonment of the dead donor rule, (2) legislative revisions reflecting abandonment of the dead donor rule, and (3) requirement of mandated choice to facilitate individual participation in organ donation and to ensure that decisions to participate are made in compliance with the societal values of respect for autonomy and self-determination.
心脏或循环系统死亡后器官捐献(DCD)已被引入以增加可移植器官的供应。在本文中,我们认为,在DCD中获取对移植有用的存活器官与死亡供体规则不相容,并解释了相应的伦理和法律后果。我们还概述了当前DCD同意程序在披露自愿知情决策所需要素以及尊重供体自主权方面的严重缺陷。我们比较了社会上增加器官捐献同意的两种替代方案:推定同意和强制选择。我们得出结论,从死者身上获取可移植器官需要器官捐献伦理的范式转变。确保DCD实践合法性的范式转变必须包括:(1)社会就放弃死亡供体规则达成一致,(2)反映放弃死亡供体规则的立法修订,以及(3)强制选择的要求,以促进个人参与器官捐献,并确保参与决策符合尊重自主权和自决权的社会价值观。