• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在群体中消除以自我为中心的责任评估的成本与收益。

The costs and benefits of undoing egocentric responsibility assessments in groups.

作者信息

Caruso Eugene, Epley Nicholas, Bazerman Max H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):857-71. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.857.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.857
PMID:17059306
Abstract

Individuals working in groups often egocentrically believe they have contributed more of the total work than is logically possible. Actively considering others' contributions effectively reduces these egocentric assessments, but this research suggests that undoing egocentric biases in groups may have some unexpected costs. Four experiments demonstrate that members who contributed much to the group outcome are actually less satisfied and less interested in future collaborations after considering others' contributions compared with those who contributed little. This was especially true in cooperative groups. Egocentric biases in responsibility allocation can create conflict, but this research suggests that undoing these biases can have some unfortunate consequences. Some members who look beyond their own perspective may not like what they see.

摘要

在团队中工作的个体往往会以自我为中心地认为,他们在总工作量中所做的贡献比逻辑上可能的更多。积极考虑他人的贡献能有效减少这些以自我为中心的评估,但这项研究表明,消除团队中的自我中心偏见可能会带来一些意想不到的代价。四项实验表明,与贡献少的成员相比,那些对团队成果贡献大的成员在考虑他人贡献后,对未来合作的满意度和兴趣实际上更低。在合作团队中尤其如此。责任分配中的自我中心偏见会引发冲突,但这项研究表明,消除这些偏见可能会产生一些不幸的后果。一些超越自身视角的成员可能不喜欢他们所看到的。

相似文献

1
The costs and benefits of undoing egocentric responsibility assessments in groups.在群体中消除以自我为中心的责任评估的成本与收益。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):857-71. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.857.
2
When perspective taking increases taking: reactive egoism in social interaction.当观点采择增加时:社会互动中的反应性利己主义。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):872-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.872.
3
Self-centered social exchange: differential use of costs versus benefits in prosocial reciprocity.以自我为中心的社会交换:亲社会互惠中成本与收益的差异化使用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Nov;97(5):796-810. doi: 10.1037/a0016233.
4
Team negotiation: social, epistemic, economic, and psychological consequences of subgroup conflict.团队谈判:亚群体冲突的社会、认知、经济及心理后果
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1687-702. doi: 10.1177/0146167208324102. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
5
Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment.将换位思考视为以自我为中心的锚定与调整。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):327-39. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327.
6
Working for the self or working for the group: how self- versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups.为自己工作还是为群体工作:自我肯定与群体肯定如何影响低地位群体中的集体行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):183-202. doi: 10.1037/a0013068.
7
The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans.神经肽催产素调节人类群体间冲突中的狭隘利他主义。
Science. 2010 Jun 11;328(5984):1408-11. doi: 10.1126/science.1189047.
8
Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.人类判断中偏差的认知与误判
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jan;11(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
9
When trying to understand detracts from trying to behave: effects of perspective taking in intergroup interaction.当试图理解会妨碍行为表现时:群体间互动中换位思考的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Apr;96(4):811-27. doi: 10.1037/a0013411.
10
Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis.好人先赢:竞争性利他主义假说。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Oct;32(10):1402-13. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291006.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspective-Taking and Reactions Toward Poor Performers in Groups: A Scoping Review and Discussion.群体中对表现不佳者的换位思考及反应:一项范围综述与讨论
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 1;15(5):612. doi: 10.3390/bs15050612.
2
Bounded research ethicality: researchers rate themselves and their field as better than others at following good research practice.有界的研究伦理:研究人员自我评估和其所在领域在遵循良好研究实践方面优于其他领域。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 6;14(1):3050. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53450-0.
3
Configuration of prosocial motivations to enhance employees' innovation behaviors: From the perspective of coupling of basic and applied research.
增强员工创新行为的亲社会动机配置:基于基础研究与应用研究耦合的视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:958949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958949. eCollection 2022.
4
Perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against American Indians: Converging evidence from the museum and lab.换位思考会增加情绪和同理心,但不会减少对美洲原住民的有害偏见:博物馆和实验室的证据趋同。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0228784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228784. eCollection 2020.
5
Linking Self-Construal to Creativity: The Role of Approach Motivation and Cognitive Flexibility.将自我建构与创造力联系起来:趋近动机和认知灵活性的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 10;9:1929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01929. eCollection 2018.
6
The Experience of Failed Humor: Implications for Interpersonal Affect Regulation.失败的幽默体验:对人际情感调节的启示
J Bus Psychol. 2014;29(4):651-668. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014-9370-9.
7
What Reasons Might the Other One Have?-Perspective Taking to Reduce Psychological Reactance in Individualists and Collectivists.另一个人可能有什么理由?——通过换位思考减少个人主义者和集体主义者的心理抗拒
Psychology (Irvine). 2012 Dec 31;3(12A):1153-1160. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.312A170.