Walsh Declan, Perin Mary Lou, McIver Beth
The Harry R Horvitz Center for Palliative Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Oct-Nov;23(5):353-9. doi: 10.1177/1049909106292170.
Prescribing patterns for parenteral morphine for symptom control in advanced cancer were studied in 50 consecutive hospital admissions (27 men, 23 women, median age, 62 years). Patients were interviewed daily (median time, 9 days) concerning analgesia while they were receiving parenteral morphine. Five major inpatient prescribing patterns were identified: (1) intravenous to oral, (2) intravenous to subcutaneous, (3) intravenous only, (4) subcutaneous only, and (5) mixed. The intravenoustooral group had more stable pain control than the intravenous-to-subcutaneous group. Pain control was good in the mixed group, suggesting that flexibility in the route of administration contributes to better pain control. Patients with neuropathic pain required higher doses of morphine. These patterns of parenteral morphine application reflect the complexity of the challenge presented by the various cancer pain syndromes. Physicians should be knowledgeable about the appropriate and flexible use of different routes of administration for morphine and other opioids.
对50例连续住院患者(27例男性,23例女性,中位年龄62岁)使用胃肠外吗啡控制晚期癌症症状的处方模式进行了研究。在患者接受胃肠外吗啡治疗期间,每天(中位时间为9天)就镇痛情况对其进行访谈。确定了五种主要的住院处方模式:(1)静脉转口服,(2)静脉转皮下,(3)仅静脉注射,(4)仅皮下注射,以及(5)混合使用。静脉转口服组的疼痛控制比静脉转皮下组更稳定。混合组的疼痛控制良好,这表明给药途径的灵活性有助于更好地控制疼痛。神经性疼痛患者需要更高剂量的吗啡。这些胃肠外吗啡的应用模式反映了各种癌症疼痛综合征所带来挑战的复杂性。医生应了解吗啡和其他阿片类药物不同给药途径的恰当和灵活使用方法。