Suppr超能文献

筛查项目中的知情选择:宣传册有帮助吗?一项批判性文献综述。

Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review.

作者信息

Fox Rosemary

机构信息

National Public Health Service for Wales, Temple of Peace and Health Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NW, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Dec;28(4):309-17. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl066. Epub 2006 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening programmes aim to maximise population benefit by maximizing uptake but must also allow informed choice about participation. Many programmes provide potential participants with information leaflets. This article reviews studies of the effectiveness of leaflets in promoting informed choice in screening.

METHODS

I searched 15 electronic databases and the websites of UK screening programmes, searched the bibliographies of identified studies and contacted experts in the field. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials where an attempt had been made to determine the contribution of leaflets to the exercise of informed choice in screening decisions were included.

RESULTS

I identified nine trials from various screening programmes. Outcome measures included knowledge, attitudes to screening, intention to be screened, uptake, anxiety, satisfaction with decision-making, discussions about screening with care providers and agreement that enough information had been provided to allow informed choice. Most studies demonstrated that providing written information increased knowledge, but evidence that this promoted informed choice was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Research into informed choice in screening is hampered by the lack of agreement about its definition and measurement. The most effective way for screening programmes to achieve informed choice is unclear. Programmes should not rely solely on providing written information but should explore additional ways to promote informed choice.

摘要

背景

筛查项目旨在通过提高参与率使人群受益最大化,但也必须允许人们在参与方面做出明智的选择。许多项目会向潜在参与者提供信息手册。本文回顾了关于手册在促进筛查中明智选择方面有效性的研究。

方法

我检索了15个电子数据库以及英国筛查项目的网站,检索了已识别研究的参考文献,并联系了该领域的专家。纳入了那些试图确定手册对筛查决策中明智选择的作用的随机对照试验(RCT)和对照临床试验。

结果

我从各种筛查项目中识别出9项试验。结果指标包括知识、对筛查的态度、筛查意愿、参与率、焦虑、对决策的满意度、与医疗服务提供者关于筛查的讨论以及是否认为已提供足够信息以做出明智选择。大多数研究表明,提供书面信息能增加知识,但关于这能促进明智选择的证据不足。

结论

关于筛查中明智选择的研究因对其定义和衡量缺乏共识而受阻。筛查项目实现明智选择的最有效方式尚不清楚。项目不应仅依赖提供书面信息,而应探索其他促进明智选择的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验