Stapleton Helen, Kirkham Mavis, Thomas Gwenan
Women's Informed Childbearing and Health Research Group, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7ND.
BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.639.
To examine the use of evidence based leaflets on informed choice in maternity services.
Non-participant observation of 886 antenatal consultations. 383 in depth interviews with women using maternity services and health professionals providing antenatal care.
Women's homes; antenatal and ultrasound clinics in 13 maternity units in Wales.
Childbearing women and health professionals who provide antenatal care.
Provision of 10 pairs of Informed Choice leaflets for service users and staff and a training session in their use.
Participants' views and commonly observed responses during consultations and interviews.
Health professionals were positive about the leaflets and their potential to assist women in making informed choices, but competing demands within the clinical environment undermined their effective use. Time pressures limited discussion, and choice was often not available in practice. A widespread belief that technological intervention would be viewed positively in the event of litigation reinforced notions of "right" and "wrong" choices rather than "informed" choices. Hierarchical power structures resulted in obstetricians defining the norms of clinical practice and hence which choices were possible. Women's trust in health professionals ensured their compliance with professionally defined choices, and only rarely were they observed asking questions or making alternative requests. Midwives rarely discussed the contents of the leaflets or distinguished them from other literature related to pregnancy. The visibility and potential of the leaflets as evidence based decision aids was thus greatly reduced.
The way in which the leaflets were disseminated affected promotion of informed choice in maternity care. The culture into which the leaflets were introduced supported existing normative patterns of care and this ensured informed compliance rather than informed choice.
研究基于证据的宣传册在产妇服务知情选择中的使用情况。
对886次产前咨询进行非参与性观察。对使用产妇服务的女性和提供产前护理的卫生专业人员进行383次深入访谈。
威尔士13个产科单位的妇女家中、产前诊所和超声诊所。
生育期妇女和提供产前护理的卫生专业人员。
为服务使用者和工作人员提供10套知情选择宣传册,并开展关于如何使用这些宣传册的培训课程。
咨询和访谈过程中参与者的观点以及常见的反应。
卫生专业人员对宣传册及其协助女性做出知情选择的潜力持积极态度,但临床环境中的其他需求影响了宣传册的有效使用。时间压力限制了讨论,在实际中往往无法提供选择。一种普遍的观念认为,在诉讼情况下技术干预会被视为积极的,这强化了“正确”和“错误”选择的观念,而非“知情”选择的观念。等级权力结构导致产科医生定义临床实践规范,进而决定哪些选择是可行的。女性对卫生专业人员的信任确保了她们会遵从专业人员定义的选择,很少观察到她们提出问题或提出其他要求。助产士很少讨论宣传册的内容,也很少将其与其他与怀孕相关的文献区分开来。因此,宣传册作为基于证据的决策辅助工具的可见度和潜力大大降低。
宣传册的传播方式影响了产妇护理中知情选择的推广。引入宣传册的文化支持现有的规范性护理模式,这确保了知情的遵从而非知情的选择。