• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用基于证据的宣传册促进产妇护理中的知情选择:日常实践中的随机对照试验

Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice.

作者信息

O'Cathain A, Walters S J, Nicholl J P, Thomas K J, Kirkham M

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield S1 4DA.

出版信息

BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):643. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.643.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.324.7338.643
PMID:11895822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC84396/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of leaflets on promoting informed choice in women using maternity services.

DESIGN

Cluster trial, with maternity units randomised to use leaflets (intervention units) or offer usual care (control units). Data collected through postal questionnaires.

SETTING

13 maternity units in Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Four separate samples of women using maternity services. Antenatal samples: women reaching 28 weeks' gestation before (n=1386) and after (n=1778) the intervention. Postnatal samples: women at eight weeks after delivery before (n=1741) and after (n=1547) the intervention.

INTERVENTION

Provision of 10 pairs of Informed Choice leaflets for service users and midwives and a training session for staff in their use.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in the proportion of women who reported exercising informed choice.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

changes in women's knowledge; satisfaction with information, choice, and discussion; and possible consequences of informed choice.

RESULTS

There was no change in the proportion of women who reported that they exercised informed choice in the intervention units compared with the control units for either antenatal or postnatal women. There was a small increase in satisfaction with information in the antenatal samples in the intervention units compared with the control units (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.88). Only three quarters of women in the intervention units reported being given at least one of the leaflets, indicating problems with the implementation of the intervention.

CONCLUSION

In everyday practice, evidence based leaflets were not effective in promoting informed choice in women using maternity services.

摘要

目的

评估宣传册对使用产科服务的女性做出明智选择的促进作用。

设计

整群试验,产科单位被随机分为使用宣传册的组(干预组)或提供常规护理的组(对照组)。通过邮寄问卷收集数据。

地点

威尔士的13个产科单位。

参与者

使用产科服务的女性的四个独立样本。产前样本:干预前(n = 1386)和干预后(n = 1778)妊娠达到28周的女性。产后样本:干预前(n = 1741)和干预后(n = 1547)分娩后8周的女性。

干预措施

为服务使用者和助产士提供10套《明智选择》宣传册,并为工作人员提供关于如何使用宣传册的培训课程。

主要观察指标

报告做出明智选择的女性比例的变化。

次要指标

女性知识的变化;对信息、选择和讨论的满意度;以及明智选择可能产生的后果。

结果

与对照组相比,干预组中报告做出明智选择的产前和产后女性比例均无变化。与对照组相比,干预组产前样本中对信息的满意度略有提高(优势比1.40,95%置信区间1.05至1.88)。干预组中只有四分之三的女性报告至少收到了其中一本宣传册,这表明干预措施的实施存在问题。

结论

在日常实践中,基于证据的宣传册对促进使用产科服务的女性做出明智选择并无效果。

相似文献

1
Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice.使用基于证据的宣传册促进产妇护理中的知情选择:日常实践中的随机对照试验
BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):643. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.643.
2
Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care.产科护理中循证宣传册的定性研究。
BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.639.
3
Women's perceptions of informed choice in maternity care.女性对孕产护理中知情选择的认知。
Midwifery. 2002 Jun;18(2):136-44. doi: 10.1054/midw.2002.0301.
4
Informed choice for users of health services: views on ultrasonography leaflets of women in early pregnancy, midwives, and ultrasonographers.卫生服务使用者的知情选择:早孕女性、助产士和超声检查人员对超声检查传单的看法。
BMJ. 1996 Nov 16;313(7067):1251-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7067.1251a.
5
Use of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities to improve women's informed decision making: a cluster randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN22532458].使用胎儿异常产前检测决策辅助工具以改善女性的知情决策:一项整群随机对照试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN22532458]
BJOG. 2008 Feb;115(3):339-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01576.x.
6
Choices about abortion method: assessing the quality of patient information leaflets in England and Wales.堕胎方法的选择:评估英格兰和威尔士患者信息手册的质量。
BJOG. 2003 Mar;110(3):263-6.
7
Quality assessment of patient leaflets on misoprostol-induced labour: does written information adhere to international standards for patient involvement and informed consent?米索前列醇引产患者说明书的质量评估:书面信息是否符合患者参与和知情同意的国际标准?
BMJ Open. 2016 May 27;6(5):e011333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011333.
8
Audiovisual information affects informed choice and experience of information in antenatal Down syndrome screening--a randomized controlled trial.视听信息影响产前唐氏综合征筛查中信息的知情选择和体验——一项随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):390-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
9
A participatory action research study exploring women's understandings of the concept of informed choice during pregnancy and childbirth in Ireland.一项参与式行动研究,探讨爱尔兰女性对孕期及分娩期间知情选择概念的理解。
Midwifery. 2017 Mar;46:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
A practice change intervention to improve antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption by women during pregnancy: research protocol for a randomised stepped-wedge cluster trial.一项实践改变干预措施,旨在改善孕期妇女饮酒问题的产前保健:一项随机阶梯式楔形群组试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Aug 20;13(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0806-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A survey on the perceptions of midwives, women, and support persons on the introduction of a support person information resource.关于助产士、产妇及陪护人员对引入陪护人员信息资源看法的调查。
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Aug 22;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/191162. eCollection 2024.
2
Perspectives of pregnant women on maternal health information handouts at KwaZulu-Natal sub-district.夸祖鲁-纳塔尔地区孕妇对母婴健康信息手册的看法。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2024 Feb 29;16(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4158.
3
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
4
Analysing cluster randomised controlled trials using GLMM, GEE1, GEE2, and QIF: results from four case studies.分析使用 GLMM、GEE1、GEE2 和 QIF 的整群随机对照试验:四项案例研究的结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02107-z.
5
Informing about childbirth without increasing anxiety: a qualitative study of first-time pregnant women and partners' perceptions and needs.告知分娩信息而不增加焦虑:对初次怀孕的妇女及其伴侣的感知和需求的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06105-3.
6
Strategies to improve interpersonal communication along the continuum of maternal and newborn care: A scoping review and narrative synthesis.改善母婴连续护理过程中人际沟通的策略:一项范围综述和叙述性综合分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 11;3(10):e0002449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002449. eCollection 2023.
7
Model-based economic evaluation of the effectiveness of "'Hypos' can strike twice", a leaflet-based ambulance clinician referral intervention to prevent recurrent hypoglycaemia.基于模型的经济性评价:基于传单的救护车临床医生转介干预预防复发性低血糖——“低血糖可以两次发作”。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0282987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282987. eCollection 2023.
8
Vaginal Birth at Term - Part 1. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/083, December 2020).足月阴道分娩 - 第1部分。德国妇产科学会、奥地利妇产科学会和瑞士妇产科学会指南(S3级,德国医学和科学信息平台注册号015/083,2020年12月)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Nov 3;82(11):1143-1193. doi: 10.1055/a-1904-6546. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
Effectiveness of Shared Decision-making Training Programs for Health Care Professionals Using Reflexivity Strategies: Secondary Analysis of a Systematic Review.使用反思策略的医疗保健专业人员共同决策培训项目的有效性:一项系统评价的二次分析
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Dec 7;8(4):e42033. doi: 10.2196/42033.
10
Identifying barriers to the educational role of midwives in Cyprus and defining determinants in behaviour terms using the Behaviour Change Wheel: a mixed-method formative study.识别塞浦路斯助产士教育角色的障碍,并使用行为改变轮(Behaviour Change Wheel)从行为术语定义决定因素:一项混合方法形成性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):1233. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08599-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care.产科护理中循证宣传册的定性研究。
BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.639.
2
Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.在日常实践中实施共同决策:障碍与机遇
Health Expect. 2000 Sep;3(3):182-191. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00093.x.
3
Supporting and resourcing treatment decision-making: some policy considerations.支持治疗决策并提供相关资源:一些政策考量
Health Expect. 2000 Mar;3(1):77-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00087.x.
4
Editorial: special conference issue.社论:特别会议专刊。
Health Expect. 2000 Mar;3(1):1-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00085.x.
5
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.面向面临健康治疗或筛查决策的患者的决策辅助工具:系统评价
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):731-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.731.
6
The Control Preferences Scale.控制偏好量表。
Can J Nurs Res. 1997 Fall;29(3):21-43.
7
Breaking the matches in a paired t-test for community interventions when the number of pairs is small.在社区干预的配对t检验中,当配对数量较少时打破配对。
Stat Med. 1995 Jul 15;14(13):1491-504. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141309.