• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量测量方法概述。健康应用中的等效性、不变性和项目功能差异。

Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications.

作者信息

Teresi Jeanne A

机构信息

Columbia University Stroud Center and Faculty of Medicine, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Research Division, Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale, Riverdale, New York, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S39-49. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245452.48613.45.

DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245452.48613.45
PMID:17060834
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reviewed in this article are issues relating to the study of invariance and differential item functioning (DIF). The aim of factor analyses and DIF, in the context of invariance testing, is the examination of group differences in item response conditional on an estimate of disability. Discussed are parameters and statistics that are not invariant and cannot be compared validly in crosscultural studies with varying distributions of disability in contrast to those that can be compared (if the model assumptions are met) because they are produced by models such as linear and nonlinear regression.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this overview is to provide an integrated approach to the quantitative methods used in this special issue to examine measurement equivalence. The methods include classical test theory (CTT), factor analytic, and parametric and nonparametric approaches to DIF detection. Also included in the quantitative section is a discussion of item banking and computerized adaptive testing (CAT).

METHODS

Factorial invariance and the articles discussing this topic are introduced. A brief overview of the DIF methods presented in the quantitative section of the special issue is provided together with a discussion of ways in which DIF analyses and examination of invariance using factor models may be complementary.

CONCLUSIONS

Although factor analytic and DIF detection methods share features, they provide unique information and can be viewed as complementary in informing about measurement equivalence.

摘要

背景

本文回顾了与不变性和项目功能差异(DIF)研究相关的问题。在不变性检验的背景下,因子分析和DIF的目的是在对残疾进行估计的条件下,检验项目反应中的群体差异。文中讨论了在跨文化研究中,由于残疾分布不同而不具有不变性且无法有效比较的参数和统计量,以及那些(如果满足模型假设)因由线性和非线性回归等模型产生而可以进行比较的参数和统计量。

目的

本综述的目的是为本期特刊中用于检验测量等价性的定量方法提供一种综合方法。这些方法包括经典测验理论(CTT)、因子分析以及用于检测DIF的参数和非参数方法。定量部分还包括对题库和计算机自适应测试(CAT)的讨论。

方法

介绍了因子不变性以及讨论该主题的文章。对特刊定量部分中提出的DIF方法进行了简要概述,并讨论了DIF分析和使用因子模型检验不变性可能互补的方式。

结论

尽管因子分析和DIF检测方法有共同特点,但它们提供了独特的信息,并且在告知测量等价性方面可被视为互补。

相似文献

1
Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications.定量测量方法概述。健康应用中的等效性、不变性和项目功能差异。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S39-49. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245452.48613.45.
2
Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications. Advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics.健康应用中项目功能差异的不同方法。优点、缺点及一些被忽视的主题。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S152-70. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245142.74628.ab.
3
An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.一篇关于测量与因子不变性的文章。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89.
4
Differential item functioning (DIF) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Overview, sample, and issues of translation.项目功能差异(DIF)与简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)。概述、样本及翻译问题。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S95-S106. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245181.96133.db.
5
Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach. Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination.使用项目反应理论和基于似然的模型比较方法识别差异项目功能。在简易精神状态检查表中的应用。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S134-42. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245251.83359.8c.
6
The role of nonlinear factor-to-indicator relationships in tests of measurement equivalence.非线性因素与指标关系在测量等效性检验中的作用。
Psychol Methods. 2005 Sep;10(3):305-16. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.305.
7
Identification of measurement differences between English and Spanish language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Detecting differential item functioning using MIMIC modeling.《简易精神状态检查表》英文和西班牙文版本测量差异的识别。使用MIMIC模型检测项目功能差异。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S124-33. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245250.50114.0f.
8
Measurement equivalence and differential item functioning in family psychology.家庭心理学中的测量等价性与项目功能差异
J Fam Psychol. 2005 Sep;19(3):441-55. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.441.
9
Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).健康相关生活质量题库的心理测量评估与校准:患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)计划
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S22-31. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04.
10
Cross-cultural evaluation of health status using item response theory: FACT-B comparisons between Austrian and U.S. patients with breast cancer.使用项目反应理论对健康状况进行跨文化评估:奥地利和美国乳腺癌患者的FACT-B比较
Eval Health Prof. 2005 Jun;28(2):233-59. doi: 10.1177/0163278705275343.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) used as the benchmark in validation of 101 quality-of-life instruments: A systematic review.皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)用作101种生活质量工具验证的基准:一项系统评价。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Mar;39(3):631-679. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20321. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Does strict invariance matter? Valid group mean comparisons with ordered-categorical items.严格不变性重要吗?有序分类项目的有效组均值比较。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3117-3139. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02247-6. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Gender-Based Differential Item Function for the Positive and Negative Semantic Dimensions of the Relationship Satisfaction Scale with Item Response Theory.
基于项目反应理论的关系满意度量表正负语义维度的性别差异项目功能
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 7;13(10):825. doi: 10.3390/bs13100825.
4
Defining aphasia: Content analysis of six aphasia diagnostic batteries.定义失语症:六种失语症诊断工具的内容分析。
Cortex. 2023 Sep;166:19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 22.
5
Adaptation and Validation of the Shame Questionnaire Among Ugandan Youth Living with HIV.乌干达感染艾滋病毒青年羞耻感问卷的改编与验证
Child Indic Res. 2019 Jun 15;12(3):1023-1042. doi: 10.1007/s12187-018-9570-3. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
6
Dutch reference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scale v1.2 - Global Health (PROMIS-GH).患者报告结局测量信息系统量表v1.2 - 全球健康(PROMIS - GH)的荷兰参考值。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 May 12;5(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00314-0.
7
Measurement of the problematic usage of the Internet unidimensional quasitrait continuum with item response theory.用项目反应理论测量互联网一维准特质连续体的问题使用情况。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Jul;33(7):652-671. doi: 10.1037/pas0000870. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
8
Measuring Self-Reported Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment: Recommendations From the Cancer Neuroscience Initiative Working Group.测量自我报告的癌症相关认知障碍:癌症神经科学倡议工作组的建议。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 29;113(12):1625-1633. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab027.
9
Assessing differential item functioning for the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale: a Scleroderma atient-centred Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort Study.评估社交外表焦虑量表的项目功能差异:一项硬皮病患者中心干预网络(SPIN)队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 12;10(10):e037639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037639.
10
Reproductive Health in Women with Physical Disability: A Conceptual Framework for the Development of New Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.身体残疾女性的生殖健康:开发新的患者报告结局测量指标的概念框架。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Nov;29(11):1427-1436. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8174. Epub 2020 May 19.