Suppr超能文献

识别中独特性效应的情境干扰解释。

A contextual interference account of distinctiveness effects in recognition.

作者信息

Park Heekyeong, Arndt Jason, Reder Lynne M

机构信息

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):743-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03193422.

Abstract

In this article, we report on two experiments that aimed to shed light on the memorability effect that derives from varying the uniqueness of contextual cues presented at encoding and retrieval. We sought to understand the locus of the recognition advantage for studying and testing words with nominally irrelevant features that are rarely shared with other words ("low-fan" features) as compared with features that are studied with more words ("high-fan" features). Each word was studied with one high-fan feature and one low-fan feature, but only one of the two features was reinstated at test. Recognition judgments were more accurate when the low-fan feature was reinstated than when the high-fan feature was reinstated. The data suggest that encoding cues that suffer from contextual interference negatively affect retrieval and do so by hindering recollection-based processing.

摘要

在本文中,我们报告了两项实验,旨在阐明因改变编码和检索时呈现的情境线索的独特性而产生的记忆效果。我们试图了解,与那些被更多单词共享的特征(“高扇面”特征)相比,研究和测试具有名义上无关紧要、很少与其他单词共享的特征(“低扇面”特征)的单词时,识别优势的来源。每个单词都与一个高扇面特征和一个低扇面特征一起学习,但在测试时只恢复其中一个特征。当恢复低扇面特征时,识别判断比恢复高扇面特征时更准确。数据表明,受到情境干扰的编码线索会对检索产生负面影响,并且是通过阻碍基于回忆的加工来实现的。

相似文献

1
A contextual interference account of distinctiveness effects in recognition.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):743-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03193422.
2
Does context recollection depend on the base-rate of contextual features?
Cogn Process. 2024 Feb;25(1):9-35. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01153-1. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
3
Effects of item distinctiveness on the retrieval of objects and object-location bindings from visual working memory.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Oct;84(7):2236-2254. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02451-0. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Recollection-Based Retrieval Is Influenced by Contextual Variation at Encoding but Not at Retrieval.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 2;10(7):e0130403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130403. eCollection 2015.
5
The effect of intrinsic image memorability on recollection and familiarity.
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):998-1018. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01105-6. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
6
The neural correlates of competition during memory retrieval are modulated by attention to the cues.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2427-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
7
Comparison of the neural correlates of retrieval success in tests of cued recall and recognition memory.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Mar;33(3):523-33. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21229. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
8
Brain mechanisms of successful recognition through retrieval of semantic context.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1694-704. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00587. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
9
Recognition for word triplets in complex networks.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Jun;76(2):132-143. doi: 10.1037/cep0000267. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
10
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):805-15. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.805.

引用本文的文献

1
A context-change account of temporal distinctiveness.
Mem Cognit. 2019 Aug;47(6):1158-1172. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00925-5.
2
Inferential Costs of Trait Centrality in Impression Formation: Organization in Memory and Misremembering.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 22;8:1408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01408. eCollection 2017.
4
Overdistribution in source memory.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):413-39. doi: 10.1037/a0025645. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
5
The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task.
Cognition. 2010 Apr;115(1):118-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
6
The role of memory activation in creating false memories of encoding context.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):66-79. doi: 10.1037/a0017394.
8
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):805-15. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.805.

本文引用的文献

1
Isolation and spread of effect in serial learning.
Am J Psychol. 1948 Apr;61(2):214-21.
2
The list strength effect: a contextual competition account.
Mem Cognit. 2005 Oct;33(7):1289-302. doi: 10.3758/bf03193229.
3
In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Aug;11(4):616-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03196616.
4
The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):150-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03206475.
5
Remember-know: a matter of confidence.
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):524-42. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.524.
6
Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Oct;31(7):1045-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03196125.
7
Surprise as a factor in the von Restorff effect.
J Exp Psychol. 1956 Nov;52(5):340-4. doi: 10.1037/h0047496.
8
Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: the role of contextual fan.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Mar;30(2):312-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03195292.
9
What causes the isolation effect?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Nov;27(6):1359-66.
10
Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):361-79. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.361.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验