Department of Psychology, Middlebury College, 276 Bicentennial Hall, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):66-79. doi: 10.1037/a0017394.
Using 3 experiments, I examined false memory for encoding context by presenting Deese-Roediger-McDermott themes (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995) in usual-looking fonts and by testing related, but unstudied, lure items in a font that was shown during encoding. In 2 of the experiments, testing lure items in the font used to study their associated themes increased false recognition relative to testing lure items in a font that was used to study a different lure's theme. Further, studying a larger number of associates exacerbated the influence of testing lure items in a font used to study their associated themes. Finally, testing lures in a font that was encoded many times, but was not used to present the lures' studied associates, increased lure errors more than testing lures in a font that was encoded relatively fewer times. These results favor the explanation of false recognition offered by global-matching models of recognition memory over the explanations of activation-monitoring theory and fuzzy-trace theory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
通过 3 个实验，我通过呈现 Deese-Roediger-McDermott 主题（Deese，1959；Roediger & McDermott，1995）来检验编码语境的虚假记忆，这些主题采用看起来平常的字体，并且在编码过程中使用字体来测试相关但未学习过的诱饵项目。在 2 个实验中，在用于学习相关主题的字体中测试诱饵项目会增加虚假识别率，而在用于学习不同诱饵主题的字体中测试诱饵项目则不会。此外，学习更多的联想词会加剧在用于学习相关主题的字体中测试诱饵项目的影响。最后，在多次编码但未用于呈现诱饵联想词的字体中测试诱饵词，比在相对较少编码的字体中测试诱饵词会导致更多的错误。这些结果支持了识别记忆的全局匹配模型的解释，而不是激活监测理论和模糊痕迹理论的解释。（APA，保留所有权利）。
