Bonds Denise E, Ellis Shellie D, Weeks Erin, Palla Shana L, Lichstein Peter
Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Oct 25;7:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-63.
Interventions to change practice patterns among health care professionals have had mixed success. We tested the effectiveness of a practice centered intervention to increase screening for domestic violence in primary care practices.
A multifaceted intervention was conducted among primary care practice in North Carolina. All practices designated two individuals to serve as domestic violence resources persons, underwent initial training on screening for domestic violence, and participated in 3 lunch and learn sessions. Within this framework, practices selected the screening instrument, patient educational material, and content best suited for their environment. Effectiveness was evaluated using a pre/post cross-sectional telephone survey of a random selection of female patients from each practice.
Seventeen practices were recruited and fifteen completed the study. Baseline screening for domestic violence was 16% with a range of 2% to 49%. An absolute increase in screening of 10% was achieved (range of increase 0 to 22%). After controlling for clustering by practice and other patient characteristics, female patients were 79% more likely to have been screened after the intervention (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.43-2.23).
An intervention that allowed practices to tailor certain aspects to fit their needs increased screening for domestic violence. Further studies testing this technique using other outcomes are needed.
旨在改变医疗保健专业人员执业模式的干预措施成效不一。我们测试了一种以执业为中心的干预措施在初级保健机构中增加家庭暴力筛查的有效性。
在北卡罗来纳州的初级保健机构中实施了一项多方面的干预措施。所有机构指定两人担任家庭暴力资源人员,接受家庭暴力筛查的初始培训,并参加3次午餐学习课程。在此框架内,各机构选择最适合其环境的筛查工具、患者教育材料和内容。通过对每个机构随机抽取的女性患者进行前后横断面电话调查来评估有效性。
招募了17个机构,15个完成了研究。家庭暴力的基线筛查率为16%,范围在2%至49%之间。筛查率绝对提高了10%(提高范围为0至22%)。在控制了机构聚类和其他患者特征后,干预后女性患者接受筛查的可能性增加了79%(比值比1.79,95%置信区间1.43 - 2.23)。
一种允许机构根据自身需求调整某些方面的干预措施增加了家庭暴力筛查。需要进一步研究使用其他结果来测试这种技术。