Gauldie Jack, Kolb Martin, Ask Kjetil, Martin Gail, Bonniaud Philippe, Warburton David
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street, W-MDCL-4016, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5.
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006 Nov;3(8):696-702. doi: 10.1513/pats.200605-125SF.
The incidence of finding evidence of both emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis in the same patient has received increased attention. Several investigators have found on biopsy the presence of emphysema of the upper zones and diffuse parenchymal disease with fibrosis of the lower zones of the lung, especially associated with current or previous heavy smokers. Believed previously to be two different disease mechanisms, there are now data to implicate some common pathways of cell and molecular activation leading to the different morphologic and physiologic outcomes. According to a current view, emphysema may originate from a protease/antiprotease imbalance, whereas a role for antiproteases has been proposed in the modulation of fibrosis. Overexpression of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) in experimental rodent models leads to progressive pulmonary fibrosis, accompanied with marked up-regulation of protease inhibitors, such as tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) genes, along with excessive matrix accumulation. It may be that a "matrix degrading" pulmonary microenvironment, one in which metalloproteinase activities prevail, favors the development of emphysema, whereas a "matrix nondegrading" microenvironment, with enhanced presence of TIMPs, would lead to matrix accumulation and fibrosis. Surprisingly, although Smad3 null mice, deficient in TGF-beta signal transmission, are resistant to bleomycin- and TGF-beta-mediated fibrosis, they develop spontaneous age-related airspace enlargement, consistent with emphysema, with a lack of ability to repair tissue damage appropriately. A common element is tissue damage and repair, with TGF-beta and the Smad signaling pathway playing prominent molecular roles. Both changes can be followed in experimental models with noninvasive imaging and physiologic measurements.
在同一患者中发现肺气肿和肺纤维化证据的发生率已受到越来越多的关注。几位研究者在活检中发现,肺部上叶存在肺气肿,而下叶存在伴有纤维化的弥漫性实质性疾病,尤其与当前或既往重度吸烟者相关。以前认为这是两种不同的疾病机制,现在有数据表明,细胞和分子激活的一些共同途径会导致不同的形态学和生理学结果。根据目前的观点,肺气肿可能源于蛋白酶/抗蛋白酶失衡,而抗蛋白酶在纤维化的调节中也发挥了作用。在实验性啮齿动物模型中,转化生长因子β(TGF-β)的过度表达会导致进行性肺纤维化,同时伴有蛋白酶抑制剂(如金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂(TIMP)和纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1(PAI-1)基因)明显上调,以及过多的基质积聚。可能是一种“基质降解”的肺微环境(其中金属蛋白酶活性占主导)有利于肺气肿的发展,而一种“基质非降解”的微环境(TIMP含量增加)会导致基质积聚和纤维化。令人惊讶的是,尽管缺乏TGF-β信号传导的Smad3基因敲除小鼠对博来霉素和TGF-β介导的纤维化具有抗性,但它们会出现与年龄相关的自发性气腔扩大,与肺气肿一致,且缺乏适当修复组织损伤的能力。一个共同因素是组织损伤和修复,TGF-β和Smad信号通路在其中发挥着重要的分子作用。在实验模型中,可以通过非侵入性成像和生理学测量来跟踪这两种变化。