Danion F
UMR 6152 Mouvement et Perception, Université de la Méditerranée, CNRS, Faculté des Sciences du Sport, 13 288, Marseille, France.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;118(1):146-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.009. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
Earlier studies suggest that grip force adjustments evoked by mechanical perturbations result more from cutaneous signals from the fingertips, than from afferent signals from the supporting limb. Generally an increase in tangential load at the fingertips induces an increase in grip force, whereas a decrease in load induces the opposite reaction. Some data suggest that prior knowledge and experience influences the magnitude of grip force adjustments.
This study examines the relative contribution of digital and arm afferent signals in the context of brisk involuntary upward flexions obtained either by unloading the arm (ARM) or the held object (OBJECT). Following the perturbation, the tangential load at the fingertips increased in ARM, but decreased in OBJECT. A subsidiary goal was to compare the performance of naive subjects with the performance of trained and informed subjects.
When the perturbation was completely unexpected, grip force increased sharply after OBJECT and ARM unloading. By contrast, when subjects had prior knowledge and experience with the upcoming perturbation, grip responses were clearly differentiated; grip force increased after ARM, but decreased after OBJECT.
These results challenge the view that cutaneous signals of the fingertips are the driving signals of grip force responses. Instead, afferent signals from the flexed arm would account well for the lack of difference between grip force responses in ARM and OBJECT under unpredictable conditions. These data provide clear evidence that prior knowledge and experience influences reactive grip force control, since subjects became able to repress unnecessary grip force modulation in OBJECT.
These data have implications for understanding the initiation and the modulation of grip force adjustments.
早期研究表明,由机械扰动引起的握力调整更多地源于指尖的皮肤信号,而非支撑肢体的传入信号。一般来说,指尖切向负荷的增加会导致握力增加,而负荷的减少则会引发相反的反应。一些数据表明,先验知识和经验会影响握力调整的幅度。
本研究在通过卸载手臂(ARM)或被握持物体(OBJECT)获得快速非自愿向上屈曲的情况下,研究手指和手臂传入信号的相对贡献。扰动后,ARM中指尖的切向负荷增加,而OBJECT中则减少。一个次要目标是比较新手受试者与训练有素且了解情况的受试者的表现。
当扰动完全出乎意料时,在OBJECT和ARM卸载后握力急剧增加。相比之下,当受试者对即将到来的扰动有先验知识和经验时,握力反应有明显差异;ARM后握力增加,而OBJECT后握力下降。
这些结果挑战了指尖皮肤信号是握力反应驱动信号的观点。相反,来自屈曲手臂的传入信号可以很好地解释在不可预测的条件下ARM和OBJECT中握力反应缺乏差异的原因。这些数据提供了明确的证据,表明先验知识和经验会影响反应性握力控制,因为受试者能够抑制OBJECT中不必要的握力调制。
这些数据对理解握力调整的启动和调制具有启示意义。