Turner Judith A, Holtzman Susan, Mancl Lloyd
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Dentistry, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Pain. 2007 Feb;127(3):276-286. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.005. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
Although cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT) have been demonstrated to be effective for a variety of chronic pain problems, patients vary in their response and little is known about patient characteristics that predict or moderate treatment effects. Furthermore, although cognitive-behavioral theory posits that changes in patient beliefs and coping mediate the effects of CBT on patient outcomes, little research has systematically tested this. Therefore, we examined mediators, moderators, and predictors of treatment effects in a randomized controlled trial of CBT for chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain. Pre- to post-treatment changes in pain beliefs (control over pain, disability, and pain signals harm), catastrophizing, and self-efficacy for managing pain mediated the effects of CBT on pain, activity interference, and jaw use limitations at one year. In individual mediator analyses, change in perceived pain control was the mediator that explained the greatest proportion of the total treatment effect on each outcome. Analyzing the mediators as a group, self-efficacy had unique mediating effects beyond those of control and the other mediators. Patients who reported more pain sites, depressive symptoms, non-specific physical problems, rumination, catastrophizing, and stress before treatment had higher activity interference at one year. The effects of CBT generally did not vary according to patient baseline characteristics, suggesting that all patients potentially may be helped by this therapy. The results provide further support for cognitive-behavioral models of chronic pain and point to the potential benefits of interventions to modify specific pain-related beliefs in CBT and in other health care encounters.
尽管认知行为疗法(CBT)已被证明对多种慢性疼痛问题有效,但患者的反应各不相同,对于预测或调节治疗效果的患者特征知之甚少。此外,尽管认知行为理论认为患者信念和应对方式的改变介导了CBT对患者结局的影响,但很少有研究对此进行系统测试。因此,我们在一项针对慢性颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)疼痛的CBT随机对照试验中,研究了治疗效果的中介因素、调节因素和预测因素。治疗前至治疗后疼痛信念(对疼痛的控制、残疾和疼痛信号危害)、灾难化思维以及疼痛管理自我效能的变化介导了CBT对一年时疼痛、活动干扰和下颌使用限制的影响。在个体中介分析中,感知疼痛控制的变化是解释每个结局总治疗效果最大比例的中介因素。将中介因素作为一个整体进行分析时,自我效能除了控制因素和其他中介因素之外,具有独特的中介作用。治疗前报告有更多疼痛部位、抑郁症状、非特异性身体问题、沉思、灾难化思维和压力的患者,在一年时活动干扰程度更高。CBT的效果通常不会因患者基线特征而异,这表明所有患者都可能从这种疗法中获益。这些结果为慢性疼痛的认知行为模型提供了进一步支持,并指出了在CBT和其他医疗保健过程中,干预以改变特定疼痛相关信念的潜在益处。