Suppr超能文献

抗生素通过径流和土壤流失的迁移

Antibiotic Transport via Runoff and Soil Loss.

作者信息

Davis J G, Truman C C, Kim S C, Ascough J C, Carlson K

机构信息

Dep. of Soil & Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2006 Oct 27;35(6):2250-60. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0348. Print 2006 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Research has verified the occurrence of veterinary antibiotics in manure, agricultural fields, and surface water bodies, yet little research has evaluated antibiotic runoff from agricultural fields. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential for agricultural runoff to contribute antibiotics to surface water bodies in a worst-case scenario. Our hypothesis was that there would be significant differences in antibiotic concentrations, partitioning of losses between runoff and sediment, and pseudo-partitioning coefficients (ratio of sediment concentration to runoff concentration) among antibiotics. An antibiotic solution including tetracycline (TC), chlortetracycline (CTC), sulfathiazole (STZ), sulfamethazine (SMZ), erythromycin (ERY), tylosin (TYL), and monensin (MNS) was sprayed on the soil surface 1 h before rainfall simulation (average intensity = 60 mm h(-1) for 1 h). Runoff samples were collected continuously and analyzed for aqueous and sediment antibiotic concentrations. MNS had the highest concentration in runoff, resulting in the highest absolute loss, although the amount of loss associated with sediment transport was <10%. ERY had the highest concentrations in sediment and had a relative loss associated with sediment >50%. TYL also had >50% relative loss associated with sediment, and its pseudo-partitioning coefficient (P-PC) was very high. The tetracyclines (TC and CTC) had very low aqueous concentrations and had the lowest absolute losses. If agricultural runoff is proven to result in development of resistance genes or toxicity to aquatic organisms, then erosion control practices could be used to reduce TC, ERY, and TYL losses leaving agricultural fields. Other methods will be needed to reduce transport of other antibiotics.

摘要

研究已经证实了兽用抗生素在粪便、农田和地表水体中的存在,但很少有研究评估农田抗生素径流情况。本研究的目的是在最坏的情况下评估农业径流将抗生素排入地表水体的可能性。我们的假设是,不同抗生素在浓度、径流与沉积物之间的损失分配以及伪分配系数(沉积物浓度与径流浓度之比)方面会存在显著差异。在降雨模拟(平均强度为60毫米/小时,持续1小时)前1小时,将包含四环素(TC)、金霉素(CTC)、磺胺噻唑(STZ)、磺胺二甲嘧啶(SMZ)、红霉素(ERY)、泰乐菌素(TYL)和莫能菌素(MNS)的抗生素溶液喷洒在土壤表面。连续采集径流样本,并分析水体和沉积物中的抗生素浓度。MNS在径流中的浓度最高,导致其绝对损失量最大,尽管与沉积物输送相关的损失量<10%。ERY在沉积物中的浓度最高,与沉积物相关的相对损失>50%。TYL与沉积物相关的相对损失也>50%,其伪分配系数(P-PC)非常高。四环素类(TC和CTC)在水体中的浓度非常低,绝对损失量最小。如果农业径流被证明会导致抗性基因的产生或对水生生物产生毒性,那么可以采用侵蚀控制措施来减少农田中TC、ERY和TYL的流失。还需要其他方法来减少其他抗生素的迁移。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验