Holmberg Scott D, Layton Christine M, Ghneim George S, Wagener Diane K
Research Triangle Institute International, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-5533, USA.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Sep;12(9):1414-7. doi: 10.3201/eid1209.060369.
This review assesses differences and similarities of the states in planning for pandemic influenza. We reviewed the recently posted plans of 49 states for vaccination, early epidemic surveillance and detection, and intraepidemic plans for containment of pandemic influenza. All states generally follow vaccination priorities set by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. They all also depend on National Sentinel Physician Surveillance and other passive surveillance systems to alert them to incipient epidemic influenza, but these systems may not detect local epidemics until they are well established. Because of a lack of epidemiologic data, few states explicitly discuss implementing nonpharmaceutical community interventions: voluntary self-isolation (17 states [35%]), school or other institutional closing (18 [37%]), institutional or household quarantine (15 [31%]), or contact vaccination or chemoprophylaxis (12 [25%]). This review indicates the need for central planning for pandemic influenza and for epidemiologic studies regarding containment strategies in the community.
本综述评估了各州在大流行性流感规划方面的差异与相似之处。我们审查了最近公布的49个州关于疫苗接种、早期疫情监测与检测以及疫情期间大流行性流感遏制计划。所有州总体上都遵循免疫实践咨询委员会设定的疫苗接种优先顺序。它们也都依赖国家哨点医师监测和其他被动监测系统来提醒它们注意初期的流行性感冒,但这些系统可能要等到局部疫情充分发展时才能检测到。由于缺乏流行病学数据,很少有州明确讨论实施非药物性社区干预措施:自愿自我隔离(17个州[35%])、学校或其他机构关闭(18个[37%])、机构或家庭检疫(15个[31%]),或接触者疫苗接种或化学预防(12个[25%])。本综述表明需要进行大流行性流感的中央规划以及关于社区遏制策略的流行病学研究。