Suppr超能文献

经济激励措施能否刺激质量提升?一线医生的反应。

Will financial incentives stimulate quality improvement? Reactions from frontline physicians.

作者信息

Teleki Stephanie S, Damberg Cheryl L, Pham Chau, Berry Sandra H

机构信息

RAND Health, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2006 Nov-Dec;21(6):367-74. doi: 10.1177/1062860606293602.

Abstract

Pay-for-performance is being applied at the physician level to stimulate improvements in quality of care and cost efficiency; however, little is known about how physicians will respond. We interviewed physicians exposed to a financial incentive program in California to identify possible barriers to the successful application of financial incentives by exploring physicians' opinions of and experiences with pay-for-performance programs. Reasons physicians cited for quality deficiencies included insurance coverage limitations and lack of patient compliance, time, and proper physician oversight. Physicians believe that they play a significant role and have a moderate to high degree of control over quality of care and that it is important to self-monitor. Physicians expressed the need for accurate and timely data, peer comparisons, and more patient time, staff support, and consultations with colleagues to successfully monitor and deliver quality care. Many support increased pay for delivering high-quality care but question measurement accuracy, bonus payment financing, and health plan involvement.

摘要

绩效薪酬制正在医生层面实施,以促进医疗质量的提升和成本效率的提高;然而,对于医生将如何做出反应,我们却知之甚少。我们采访了加利福尼亚州参与一项经济激励计划的医生,通过探究医生对绩效薪酬计划的看法和经历,来确定成功应用经济激励措施可能存在的障碍。医生们列举的质量缺陷原因包括保险覆盖范围限制、患者缺乏依从性、时间不足以及缺乏适当的医生监督。医生们认为他们发挥着重要作用,并且对医疗质量有中度到高度的掌控,自我监督很重要。医生们表示,为了成功监测和提供高质量医疗服务,需要准确及时的数据、同行比较,以及更多的患者诊疗时间、员工支持和与同事的会诊。许多人支持为提供高质量医疗服务增加薪酬,但对测量准确性、奖金支付资金来源以及健康计划的参与情况表示质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验