The Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation-CADRE, the Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1986-2004. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01287.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
To analyze patient perspectives of the use of financial incentives in a hypertension intervention. Study Setting. Twelve Veterans Affairs primary care clinics over a 9-month period.
Qualitative semistructured interviews conducted with 54 hypertensive veterans participating in an intervention to promote guideline-consistent therapy. Intervention components included an intervention letter requesting patients talk with their providers, an offer of U.S.$20 to bring in the letter to their provider, and a health educator phone call.
Semistructured interviews were conducted. Transcripts were coded for thematic content. The financial incentive theme was then subcoded for more detailed analysis.
Most participants (n=48; 88.9 percent) stated the incentive had (or would have) no effect on their decision to initiate a discussion with their provider. Some participants articulated reservations about the effectiveness and/or appropriateness of financial incentives in health care decisions; however, a few expressed the opinion that there may be some potential benefits to the use of financial incentives if they encourage patients to be active in their health care.
The findings of this study raise questions about the appropriateness and unintended consequences of employing patient-directed financial incentives in health care settings.
分析患者对高血压干预中使用经济激励措施的看法。 研究地点:9 个月期间的 12 家退伍军人事务初级保健诊所。
对参与促进指南一致治疗干预的 54 名高血压退伍军人进行定性半结构式访谈。干预措施包括干预信,要求患者与他们的提供者交谈,提供 20 美元以将信件带给提供者,以及健康教育者的电话访问。
进行半结构式访谈。对转录本进行主题内容编码。然后,对经济激励主题进行子编码以进行更详细的分析。
大多数参与者(n=48;88.9%)表示,激励措施对他们与提供者讨论的决定没有(或不会有)影响。一些参与者对经济激励在医疗保健决策中的有效性和/或适当性表示保留意见;然而,少数人认为,如果经济激励措施鼓励患者积极参与他们的医疗保健,那么它们可能会有一些潜在的好处。
本研究的结果提出了在医疗保健环境中使用以患者为导向的经济激励措施的适当性和意外后果的问题。