Hennrich Patrick, Bölter Regine, Wensing Michel
Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Im Neuenheimer Feld, Heidelberg, DE.
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Nov 25;20(4):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5495.
In 2009 a managed care programme for coordinated ambulatory cardiology care was established in Southern Germany. Designed as a voluntary contract between health insurers and ambulatory medical specialists, it aims for a guideline-oriented, efficient health care by general practitioners and medical specialists. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with physicians' participation and their relation to the aims of the programme.
A mixed-methods study was designed. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of 21 specialists participating and 11 specialists not participating in the programme. Structured questionnaires were sent to all eligible medical specialists, of whom 75 specialists participating and 21 specialists not participating in the programme responded. Both the interview and questionnaire covered a range of questions on the participation and implementation of the program.
Financial benefits were the most frequently named reason to participate. Other prevalent motives were the prospect of an alternative to regular health care, expected diagnostic possibilities and recommendations from peers. Reasons for not participating were mainly structural, such as technical modifications as well as economic investments and fear for one's professional autonomy.
Physicians' participation in the programme was mainly financially driven and largely unrelated to its care-related aims. Still, it is unclear if these divergences between motivation to participate and aims of a managed care programme affect its eventual impact, hence further research is required.
2009年,德国南部设立了一项针对门诊心脏病协调护理的管理式医疗计划。该计划是健康保险公司与门诊医疗专家之间的自愿合同,旨在实现全科医生和医疗专家以指南为导向的高效医疗服务。在本研究中,我们旨在确定与医生参与相关的因素及其与该计划目标的关系。
设计了一项混合方法研究。我们对21名参与该计划的专家和11名未参与该计划的专家进行了半结构化访谈。向所有符合条件的医疗专家发送了结构化问卷,其中75名参与该计划的专家和21名未参与该计划的专家进行了回复。访谈和问卷都涵盖了一系列关于该计划参与和实施的问题。
经济利益是最常被提及的参与原因。其他普遍的动机包括获得常规医疗服务替代方案的前景、预期的诊断可能性以及同行的推荐。不参与的原因主要是结构性的,如技术改造以及经济投资,还有对自身职业自主权的担忧。
医生参与该计划主要是受经济驱动,在很大程度上与该计划的护理相关目标无关。然而,尚不清楚参与动机与管理式医疗计划目标之间的这些差异是否会影响其最终效果,因此需要进一步研究。