Suppr超能文献

以急迫性为主和以压力性为主的混合性尿失禁女性之间存在差异吗?

Are there differences between women with urge predominant and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence?

作者信息

Lewis Jack B, Ng Alexander V, O'Connor R Corey, Guralnick Michael L

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(2):204-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.20359.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if there are differences in clinical and urodynamic parameters between women with urge predominant and those with stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI).

METHODS

Charts of 99 female patients with complaints of MUI were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the subjective predominance of either stress incontinence (MSUI) or urge incontinence (MUUI). All patients completed a subjective evaluation including an AUA Symptom Index, Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). Objective non-invasive measures included physical exam, 48-hr voiding diary, and a 24-hr pad test. Videourodynamics studies (VUDS), performed in all patients, were reviewed and the presence and characteristics of detrusor overactivity (DO) and stress incontinence were noted.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups with respect to symptom scores. MUUI patients had significantly higher pad usage, and lower maximum and average voided volumes than MSUI patients. They were also more likely to have lower urodynamic bladder capacities and demonstrable DO (70% vs. 26%) on VUDS with contractions occurring at lower bladder volumes and with higher amplitude. MSUI patients were more likely to have demonstrable SUI on physical examination (63% vs. 16%) and on VUDS (100% vs. 61%).

CONCLUSIONS

There do appear to be differences in clinical and urodynamic parameters between patients with stress predominant and urge predominant MUI. These may help to determine which component of the mixed incontinence is more problematic.

摘要

目的

我们试图确定以急迫性为主的女性混合性尿失禁患者与以压力性为主的女性混合性尿失禁患者在临床和尿动力学参数上是否存在差异。

方法

回顾了99例主诉混合性尿失禁的女性患者的病历。根据压力性尿失禁(MSUI)或急迫性尿失禁(MUUI)的主观优势将患者分为两组。所有患者均完成了主观评估,包括美国泌尿外科学会症状指数、泌尿生殖系统困扰量表(UDI-6)和尿失禁影响问卷(IIQ-7)。客观非侵入性测量包括体格检查、48小时排尿日记和24小时护垫试验。对所有患者进行的视频尿动力学研究(VUDS)进行了回顾,并记录了逼尿肌过度活动(DO)和压力性尿失禁的存在及特征。

结果

两组在症状评分方面无显著差异。MUUI患者的护垫使用量显著更高,最大和平均排尿量低于MSUI患者。她们在VUDS上也更有可能具有较低的尿动力学膀胱容量和可证实的DO(70%对26%),收缩发生在较低的膀胱容量且幅度更高。MSUI患者在体格检查(63%对16%)和VUDS(100%对61%)上更有可能具有可证实的压力性尿失禁。

结论

以压力性为主和以急迫性为主的混合性尿失禁患者在临床和尿动力学参数上似乎确实存在差异。这些差异可能有助于确定混合性尿失禁的哪个组成部分问题更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验