Suppr超能文献

用活化部分凝血活酶时间监测普通肝素:是时候重新审视了。

Monitoring unfractionated heparin with the aPTT: time for a fresh look.

作者信息

Eikelboom John W, Hirsh Jack

机构信息

Thrombosis Service, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2006 Nov;96(5):547-52.

Abstract

Laboratory monitoring is widely recommended to measure the anticoagulant effect of unfractionated heparin and to adjust the dose to maintain levels in the target therapeutic range. The most widely used laboratory assay for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy is the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). A fixed therapeutic range for the aPTT of 1.5 to 2.5 times the control value has become widely accepted, but the evidence supporting this range is weak and the clinical validity of using the aPTT for predicting thrombotic or bleeding events is questionable. The aPTT test is also affected by numerous preanalytic and analytic variables that are unrelated to the anticoagulant effect of unfractionated heparin, further eroding its potential value for monitoring unfractionated heparin treatment. Unfractionated heparin dose appears to be more important than the aPTT in predicting clinical efficacy. Despite serious limitations, the reliance on the aPTT is likely to continue because of its ready availability and familiarity of clinicians with the test. The focus of clinicians who manage unfractionated heparin therapy should be to ensure that an adequate starting dose of unfractionated heparin is used and that the aPTT method is standardized. Future research efforts should be directed towards developing methods to improve standardization of the aPTT assay for monitoring unfractionated heparin. Direct measures of the concentration of unfractionated heparin in the blood are attractive because these assays are not affected by many of the biologic variables that interfere with the aPTT and may be suitable for automation. However, currently available unfractionated heparin assays are much more expensive than the aPTT, are not widely available, and their validity has not been adequately assessed in clinical outcome studies.

摘要

广泛推荐进行实验室监测,以测定普通肝素的抗凝效果,并调整剂量以维持在目标治疗范围内。监测普通肝素治疗最常用的实验室检测方法是活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)。aPTT的固定治疗范围为对照值的1.5至2.5倍已被广泛接受,但支持该范围的证据薄弱,且使用aPTT预测血栓形成或出血事件的临床有效性存在疑问。aPTT检测还受到许多与普通肝素抗凝效果无关的分析前和分析变量的影响,进一步削弱了其监测普通肝素治疗的潜在价值。在预测临床疗效方面,普通肝素剂量似乎比aPTT更重要。尽管存在严重局限性,但由于aPTT易于获得且临床医生熟悉该检测方法,对其的依赖可能会继续存在。管理普通肝素治疗的临床医生应重点确保使用足够的普通肝素起始剂量,并使aPTT方法标准化。未来的研究工作应致力于开发方法,以改善监测普通肝素的aPTT检测的标准化。直接测量血液中普通肝素的浓度很有吸引力,因为这些检测不受许多干扰aPTT的生物学变量的影响,并且可能适合自动化。然而,目前可用的普通肝素检测方法比aPTT昂贵得多,不易广泛获得,且其有效性在临床结局研究中尚未得到充分评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验