Suppr超能文献

“尖峰曲线”监测未分级肝素治疗的不准确性。

Inaccuracy of a "spiked curve" for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy.

机构信息

Oklahoma City VA Medical Center, 921 13th St., Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jun;135(6):870-6. doi: 10.1309/AJCP60ZGXCJKRMJO.

Abstract

Our purpose was to determine whether the in vitro (or "spiked curve") method for the therapeutic heparin range is an accurate and valid method for heparin monitoring. Many laboratories use the in vitro method for determining the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapeutic range as a more practical method to determine the therapeutic heparin range. Is this a valid method compared with the recommended ex vivo method? Plasma samples from patients receiving UFH and a normal plasma pool spiked with UFH were compared for 8 APTT reagents (18 lots). The in vitro curve has significantly increased lower limit and upper limit values and has a significantly widened range compared with the ex vivo method. When APTT values are compared with both methods, more samples are underheparinized with the in vitro curve method. The in vitro method is not a valid method to determine an accurate therapeutic heparin range.

摘要

我们的目的是确定治疗性肝素范围的体外(或“加标曲线”)方法是否是肝素监测的准确和有效的方法。许多实验室使用体外方法来确定基于活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)的未分级肝素(UFH)治疗范围,因为这是一种更实用的方法来确定治疗性肝素范围。与推荐的离体方法相比,这是一种有效的方法吗?比较了接受 UFH 的患者的血浆样本和用 UFH 加标的正常血浆池,用于 8 种 APTT 试剂(18 个批次)。与离体方法相比,体外曲线的下限值和上限值显著增加,范围显著加宽。当将 APTT 值与两种方法进行比较时,更多的样品在用体外曲线方法进行肝素化时不足。体外方法不是确定准确治疗性肝素范围的有效方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验