Wallsten Tuula, Kjellin Lars, Lindström Leif
Centre for Clinical Research, University of Uppsala, Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;41(12):975-80. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0131-6. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
Little is known about the outcome of brief inpatient treatment interventions in routine psychiatric practice. The aim of this article was to study if subjective and assessed outcome of brief psychiatric inpatient care are related to patient characteristics, coercion at admission and during care, and other treatment characteristics.
A total of 233 involuntarily and voluntarily admitted patients were interviewed within 5 days from admission and at discharge or after 3 weeks of care. Outcome was measured as reported by patients and by change in GAF (Global Assessment Scale) scores.
Predictors for a positive subjective outcome were if the patients reported that they had been well treated by the staff and had contact persons at the ward. Predictors for a GAF improvement were a low GAF score at admission and a mood disorder diagnosis.
Subjectively reported outcome and outcome measured by assessing change in level of functioning differed. Coercion was not related to outcome. The way the patient perceived they had been treated by the staff was strongly related to subjective outcome.
在常规精神病学实践中,对于短期住院治疗干预的结果了解甚少。本文旨在研究短期精神科住院治疗的主观结果和评估结果是否与患者特征、入院时及治疗期间的强制手段以及其他治疗特征相关。
共有233名非自愿和自愿入院的患者在入院后5天内以及出院时或护理3周后接受了访谈。结果通过患者报告以及大体功能评定量表(GAF)评分的变化来衡量。
主观结果为阳性的预测因素是患者报告称他们受到了工作人员的良好治疗且在病房有联系人。GAF评分改善的预测因素是入院时GAF评分较低以及患有情绪障碍。
主观报告的结果与通过评估功能水平变化所测量的结果不同。强制手段与结果无关。患者对工作人员治疗方式的感受与主观结果密切相关。