Freemantle Nick, Nazareth Irwin, Eccles Martin, Wood John, Haines Andrew
Department of Primary Care and General Practice, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston.
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Apr;52(477):290-5.
Educational outreach visits are commonly used to promote changes in prescribing in family practice. However, the effectiveness of outreach visits has not been evaluated across a range of settings.
To estimate the effectiveness of educational outreach visits on United Kingdom (UK) general practice prescribing and to examine the extent to which practice characteristics influenced outcome.
Randomised controlled trial.
General practices in 12 health authorities in England.
Educational outreach visits were made to practices that received two of four guidelines. Each practice provided data on treatment of patients for all four guidelines for both pre and post-intervention periods. The primary outcome is average effect across all four guidelines. Secondary analyses examined the predictive effect of practice and guideline characteristics.
Seventy per cent of practices approached agreed to take part in the intervention. Overall, educational outreach was associated with a significant improvement in prescribing practice (odds ratio [OR] = 1.24 [95% CI = 1.07 to 1.42]), a 5.2% (95% CI = 1.7% to 8.7%) increase in the number of patients treated within the guideline recommendations. Smaller practices (two or fewer full-time equivalent practitioners) responded much more favourably to educational outreach than larger practices. Smaller practices improved their performance in line with the guidelines by 13.5% (95% CI = 6% to 20.9%) attributable to outreach, while larger practices improved by only 1.4% (95% CI = -2.4% to 5.3%, P-value for interaction <0.001).
In large practices, educational outreach alone is unlikely to achieve worthwhile change. There is good evidence to support the use of educational outreach visits in small practices.
教育外展访问通常用于促进家庭医疗中处方开具的改变。然而,外展访问的有效性尚未在一系列环境中得到评估。
评估教育外展访问对英国全科医疗处方开具的有效性,并研究医疗特征对结果的影响程度。
随机对照试验。
英格兰12个卫生当局的全科医疗。
对接受四条指南中两条指南的医疗机构进行教育外展访问。每个医疗机构提供干预前后所有四条指南的患者治疗数据。主要结果是所有四条指南的平均效果。二级分析研究了医疗机构和指南特征的预测效果。
被邀请的医疗机构中有70%同意参与干预。总体而言,教育外展与处方开具实践的显著改善相关(优势比[OR]=1.24[95%置信区间=1.07至1.42]),在指南建议范围内接受治疗的患者数量增加了5.2%(95%置信区间=1.7%至8.7%)。规模较小的医疗机构(全职等效从业者为两名或更少)对教育外展的反应比规模较大者更为积极。规模较小的医疗机构因外展而使其符合指南的表现提高了13.5%(95%置信区间=6%至20.9%),而规模较大的医疗机构仅提高了1.4%(95%置信区间=-2.4%至5.3%,交互作用P值<0.001)。
在大型医疗机构中,仅靠教育外展不太可能实现有价值的改变。有充分证据支持在小型医疗机构中使用教育外展访问。